Jesda wrote:(So much for me just saying no.)
The social security "trust" fund. Hah! Typical pisspoor crapass federal management.
There's a brewing movement to switch to a consumption tax, keeping the federal government out of our paychecks until we decide to spend it. The goal is to encourage PERSONAL saving and investment for better long-term economic growth. Plus, it keeps the feds somewhat off our backs and out of our business.
A consumption tax also discourages tax hikes and excessive spending, since it puts the laffer curve into full effect.
I thought I was keeping politics out of it and just laying out the as-is condition. I think it's possible to discuss while keeping politics out of it.
In the "consumption tax" scenario, how would it be decided who is entitled to what? Would the bigger spenders get more benefits? Or would it be based on age? The sad truth is that the economy (many economies, actually) is highly dependent on the US consumer. If everyone suddenly decided to save 10% of every paycheck, it would spawn a recession. On the other hand, for a good number of people, it probably wouldn't make a difference to the numbers in their bank account.