AZhitman wrote:No one can "stamp" autoglass with a manufacturer's name except the manufacturer. Little issue of legality. Likewie, saying OEM is incorrect as well. By definition, this means "original equipment manufacturer", and what you got is not. They should have said, OEM-quality.
I didn't think so either--but I knew what they were getting at. I didn't expect a Nissan stamp--just wanted it as close as possible in looks and quality. Lots of people use "OEM" to mean OEM-substitute, whereas true OEM would have to come from Nissan.
Quote »In addition, since the glass in a unibody car is a structural member, the manufacturer of said glass (and installer) can theoretically be held liable if that part of the car's safety cage does not perform properly in the event of an accident.[/quote]Hmmm.. Hadn't thought about this. I think the key word is theoretically. I wonder if anyone has ever tried to hold a glass installer liable. The place I went has a lifetime warranty against defects in workmanship, glass quality, or install prowess. So I'm as covered as I'm going to be. My guess is another bunch of rocks flying off a truck are going to get me before I lose it to structural integrity... But you raise a good point.
Quote »Sounds like you did well, especially for $169. [/quote] Yes, I'm feeling quite pleased--the guys were really friendly, helpful when I asked lame-o newbie questions about glass replacement, and told me to come back if I ever had any problems or questions. The best part is I can see clearly again! I'd had so many miniscule rock chips that the glass would just light up like a Christmas tree when driving in the sunlight. Now it's perfectly clear. For now, anyway.
Thanks again NICO!
Brendan