Post by
onosqv »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/onosqv-u507.html
Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:34 pm
I think both of you are just arguing different points...
looks like yokota is taking the subjective standpoint - there are no noticeable changes, you won't feel **** difference
looks like Nismo_Freak is taking the more scientific standpoint - there are changes - he is not arguing whether or not most drivers will notice the difference, in the end there is more understeer - the actual amount may be neglible, but there is a difference.
Yes, there are plenty of things that affect oversteer/understeer - just because something doesn't affect it a significant amount, doesn't mean it isn't doing anything...
You don't have to believe Nismo_Freak, you don't have to believe the many of threads/articles on how track affects oversteer/understeer on various forums (kart forums come to mind here).
10mm doesn't seem like a lot, and in this case, it probably won't do anything noticeable, but doesn't mean it doesn't do anything.
One example from personal experience:
Approximately 1.5-2 months ago, we went to an autox day - my friend's car: s14, ka-t, running 17x10 all around, +12 in front, +25 in back, 255 & 275 tires respectively. Car handled oddly, slightly unpredictable. It was driveable, learnable, but the drivers would be fighting it a lot during the course of the day (weird oversteer problems needing a lot of counter steer correction) - veteran/instructor drivers noticed this, too.
Next event a couple weeks ago. Same exact setup, but added spacers to rear, effectively making it +12 & +10 front & rear. Pretty much all the drivers who drove the car felt it was significantly more neutral than before. Car still needs tweaking, but definitely better than the +12 & +25 setup.