elwesso wrote:why use a VK45? VH45s make just as much power and they are more reliable at high HP.
Couple of reasons (pro's):
1) I was under the impression that VK's make about 30-40 more hp than the VH.
2) The motors are a little bit lighter from what I have read (about 50 or so pounds).
3) This motor will pass my emission test easier than the VH will. Albeit the VH may well be able to pass better than my VG because it is a V8.
Obviously the power difference is what makes me want one. I had been looking into a VH for a while now, and almost bought a wrecked 93 Q45 the other day. After some reading online, all signs point out that the VK makes more power than the VH even with the conservative ratings. Is there any evidence to debunk this? I searched online quite a bit and could find none.
As for the unreliability, could you shed some light on that? I did not know the VK's were an unreliable motor in its upper range. I do know that I love that fact that it has VI. My maxima had a VI manifold and it made a huge difference on the dyno.
Of course there are quite a few opposing pro's for the VH as well:
1) The motor is cheaper and easier to acquire
2) The wiring will be similiar to my VG swap (assumption made upon the age of the motors; VG vs. VH)
3) Flywheel definitely bolts up to the crank, and the z32 transmission swap has already been proven possible.