1.8turboterror wrote:I know this question can't be answered exactly but anyone with a bigger turbo should be able to get me a close answer thank you. By the way its a precision sp6262 billet ball bearing with a .70 a/r. compressor and debating on a .64 or .82 v band in out exaust turbine housing I think the .82 will be laggy but i dont want the .64 to fall off to fast at top end heres a video of my new turbo with the exaust housing im selling
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1sQ6louQaYM
You say you have a built engine, correct? Do you have the right cams installed to accompany your goals? Good question, what is your goals? Because you're saying you want top end and don't want the turbo to fall off, but I think you should be more concerned witht the engine first.
Back to your turbo, looks like a pretty nice unit that does not use water jackets, but air-fin cooling. If you're looking to score some extra power on the rollers, the .82 is the way to go. But if you're looking to retain some driveability and not have such a laggy car, then a .48 or a .6? would suffice. Why are you selling .63 housing for a .64 housing? Be careful at what you wish for with this "quote" top end you speak of. The negative results could result in you never posting again in this forum or ever again. Just a friend and a enthusiast that has gone down the road you speak of and have nearly met his maker .
P.S. The housing you speak of will support you forcing your engine to rev at or around 8000rpm as long as the rest of your engine's components is supportive as well. Dee
Modified by boost_boy at 12:20 AM 4/11/2010