got_boost702 wrote:Can anyone explain why when running forced induction it is best to run lower compression???
tenkawa_akito wrote:In short, a high comp piston compressing compressed air from a turbo will lead to detonation because it will get too hot.
then it's gonna blow not because it's running 10.2:1 compression ratio, but because they're gonna push it to it's limits.BadMojo wrote:I'm waiting to see how long before SCC blows up their turbo SVT Focus. That thing's got a static compression ration of 10.2:1 and you *know* they're gonna boost it 'til it blows.
demcj wrote:then it's gonna blow not because it's running 10.2:1 compression ratio, but because they're gonna push it to it's limits.
-demetrius
demcj wrote:lowering your compression ratio to run boost is old school. most people don't push enough power to justify having to go through the trouble of rebuilding for a lower compression ratio.
10-10.5:1 is the average compression ratio of most vehicles. that would be considered high back in the day, but not anymore. there are plenty of boosted cars running these compression ratios and living healthy lives.
-demetrius
i'm not telling anyone to raise their compression ratio. it's just that there's no need to lower it to have a reliable street car.got_boost702 wrote:so if i was to raise the compresion on the sr20 to say 9.5-10.0 to 1 it would increase power and as long as i dont race around the streets everyday it would be a reliable street/track car.
BadMojo wrote:I'm just curious, but what would happen if they get one tank of really crappy pump gas? I know that the WRX computer can switch to a conservative map when you've got some ****ty fuel, but is that really something that can be done on a custom turbo setup? Is there something out there for the SR folks or the KA-T folks that's advanced enough to do that?
crappy gas is crappy gas. think about it. what happens when you put bad gas in a completely stock engine...it doesn't blow up. it just runs like crap. why wouldn't the same thing happen in a boosted engine? even though it is a factor, the quality of the fuel is not as important as the amount (air/fuel ratio).
a bad tank of gas is not going to destroy an street car. if this was the case, then no one would bother to drive high perfromance cars since there's no way to tell the quality of fuel you're getting beforehand.
Also, I guess it's just a margin of safety thing, but the Dodge SRT-4 has 8.1:1 and the Subaru WRX has static compression of something like 8.0:1.
all factory turbocharged vehicles have low compression ratio, and yes it's a emissions/safety thing.
Edit: To go one step further - what happens if you live in Southern CA, get a really bad tank of pump gas AND the ambient temperature is somewhere approaching the "fires of hell" level?
i live in south carolina where the ambient temperatures in the summertime easily hit 100 degrees, i run 87 octane instead of the recommended 93 in my 240sx, and i drive 90+ miles an hour on the stretch of interstate between my house and work everyday....i did the same thing with my wife's oldsmobile aurora which had a compression ratio of 10:1 (or 10.5:1, i can't remember which).
-demetrius