Why is it so cold?!?!!?!?!?
-
MinisterofDOOM
- Moderator
- Posts: 34350
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
- Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille - Location: The middle of nowhere.
Re: (Mr1der)
Some people just don't ever read directions.
-
MinisterofDOOM
- Moderator
- Posts: 34350
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
- Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille - Location: The middle of nowhere.
Re: (base9se)
Hey, base9se. Do are you aware of the explanation for that paradox in your sig?
Re: (MinisterofDOOM)
here's an explanation.. http://nicoclub.com/zerothread?id=90235MinisterofDOOM wrote:Hey, base9se. Do are you aware of the explanation for that paradox in your sig?
-
MinisterofDOOM
- Moderator
- Posts: 34350
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
- Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille - Location: The middle of nowhere.
Re: (Mr1der)
There's another version of that that I've been trying to find, but I can't. It's even harder to tell that its not quite right. Even the math won't give it away unless you calculate it out to three or four decimal places.
-
MinisterofDOOM
- Moderator
- Posts: 34350
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
- Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille - Location: The middle of nowhere.
Re: (Healing)
If you were able to recreate it on a large enough scale, you would see that at the point where the triangles run directly next to eachother in the second (smaller) arrangement, they actually overlap. There is a minute amount of overlap, but it's area is large enough to reduce the overall area of the larger rectangle and make it appear as though it has shrunk.
In the other version I have seen, the loss of area comes from the top and one of the side edges, and is so minute it is nearly undetectable.
Oh, and 1der...
Yours may be bigger, but mine's real.
In the other version I have seen, the loss of area comes from the top and one of the side edges, and is so minute it is nearly undetectable.
Oh, and 1der...
Yours may be bigger, but mine's real.
Find Your Forum!