Really? Why do you say that?ishkabibble wrote:And Bob Barr used to be a loon.
He seems a lot more accomplished than that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Barr.
Z
Really? Why do you say that?ishkabibble wrote:And Bob Barr used to be a loon.
What specifically though? Reason I ask is that the article seems pretty good overall about his accomplishments. Sure he has some unusual positions and stands (like the tax repeal issue), but nothing that would cause me to say that he is a a loon.ishkabibble wrote:That article provides a pretty good explanation of why.
Sorry, Greg, I'll split it out, because I still want an answer from Ish. Random comments should not be allowed to stand unchallenged.ishkabibble wrote:Take it up with your own staff, not me. Z is the one trying to continue the discussion.
If Paul runs as a Libertarian in 2012, the Republicans will have serious problems both that year (split vote) and especially in 2016 (if Paul gets 5% of the vote, which is almost assured, and thus federal funding for 2016).Cold_Zero wrote: I only bring up Ron Paul because he is very close to being a Libertarian and may have even been a party of the party at one point.