That is unfortunate.skyliner34gtr wrote: And yes, for god's sake-------IM MIGHTYVERSA-------~!~!!~!~!~!~!~!~!~!
Well, how unfortunate it may seem, I can still be a help to other people on this forum. Yes I get out of hand sometimes, but thats only sometimes and all people have to do is back down and I will do the same. People provoke and push making other people go off the edge (me). If it were a more friendly environment and people werent so negative, I wouldnt seem like an ***hole. I can help people with their problems and help create debating topics, but if I am out of line, what stops the moderators from sending me an e-mail saying I am out of line, or what stops them from locking the thread before it gets out of hand and what also stops them from deleting the bad posts? Its all preventable given that the right moderators are on duty.themadscientist wrote:
That is unfortunate.
yes please kill this thread and delete evidence of it's existence.skyliner34gtr wrote:what stops the moderators from sending me an e-mail saying I am out of line, or what stops them from locking the thread before it gets out of hand and what also stops them from deleting the bad posts? Its all preventable given that the right moderators are on duty.
hahaha, this is getting hilarious now that we found out who he wasfjwagner wrote:
yes please kill this thread and delete evidence of it's existence.
You're telling me. I had a feeling it was him. The whole, "You know how tuff Canada is?" and "This is why Canada is super awesome" rants kinda drove the idea home. Can we finally ban this s/n too?themadscientist wrote:
That is unfortunate.
I bought my 02 Camaro in 05 for 14k with only 20k miles on it. I did around $1000 in mods, and it ran 11.1 at 122. I know its not the most eye pleasing car, but it did its job.Red Devil wrote:That being said, I do think it's a waste of money. For the amount of money spent vs the results gained, it's a complete waste. You could easily buy a faster vehicle for the same amount.
skyliner34gtr wrote:what stops the moderators from sending me an e-mail saying I am out of line, or what stops them from locking the thread before it gets out of hand and what also stops them from deleting the bad posts? Its all preventable given that the right moderators are on duty.
So you are saying that we are here to be your mommy and clean up your messes after you? Do you need one of us to come by every morning and pick out the clothes your going to wear, and make sure you brushed your teeth too? I'm not sure about you but I was raised to clean up after myself and not act like an Idiot, and yes acting like an idiot on the internet is still acting like an idiot.skyliner34gtr wrote:Do you guys agree with what I wrote in response to themadscientist?
You'll have more money to get into those 'faster more customizable cars' in the future (and sooner, no less) if you don't waste too much money on your Versa. Trust me, plenty of us were 19 at one point. And many of us know what it's like to be a few years down the road a realize that we wasted money on something we didn't need at the time.Skim302 wrote:What I'm really trying to say is the V is the only car that was offered to me. I want to get into faster more customizable cars in the future so I figured why not get some training with the V. I'm not trying to make my car be anything it's not. If you ask me if it's fast I'll tell you it's not. But I personally have no problem doing stuff to it to further my understanding of modifying cars.
Uhh, Red, the 240SX came to the market with a substantial performance-minded feature: rear-wheel drive. Sure, it didn't have the most impressive I4 motivating those rear wheels, but the stock setup on the 240SX was the ideal budget-minded driver's car. A polar opposite to the Versa in that respect, in that it was a completely logical choice for performance-minded modification.Red Devil wrote:As far as modifying the V, everyone knows how I feel about it. While that may be the case, the same people have probably said the same things back when people were modding the 240SX.
If you're asking the Versa crowd that, I think you should go ask a bigger crowd called Honda-tech. Let me know what they say when you ask there They'll give you better answers than we can since they were the ones that started it all.themadscientist wrote:Seriously, flame me if you want I don't care, but I am seriously asking whether it pisses you off or not. I could not pick another car in the nissan lineup that was a worse candidate to try an wring performance out of and the first fifteen mods would all be just to bring the car up to the level of like a sentra's abilities. I just can't make sense of it. Masochistic or something is all I can deduce. I guess if you truly love the shape enough suffer the shortcomings in every other area that would at least make some sort of sense but beyond that it just seems stunningly silly.I was in the "zomg my turbo Versa blewed up thread" and my Tidda-driving wife asked the question "why try to make it fast"? I couldn't think of anything logical so I thought I would ask. She loves her lil car for all the reasons I think it was built for, it's roomy, good on gas and relatively trouble free. I don't know why the Versa seems to be giving you guys all this trouble and it's kind of ridiculous when Tidda's seem to run like a top, you have a right to get pissed.
Anyway, WTF guys, why are you trying to make the car do what it was pretty much purpose-designed not to do? It would be like me trying to put a turbo on my Hijet. Wait, nobody here knows, I am safe from claims of hipocracy.
Differences: 1) If you're talking about the SE-R, then about $7,0002) The Sentra is a SEDAN, which is not what 75% of the people on this forum were interested in.themadscientist wrote: I could not pick another car in the nissan lineup that was a worse candidate to try an wring performance out of and the first fifteen mods would all be just to bring the car up to the level of like a sentra's abilities. I just can't make sense of it.
What??? I can't believe nobody has jumped on this yet. I guess you're all too busy making sure Mighty Versa never participates in any discussion ever again. There is ONE campaign on the Versa and its for some obscure body panel covering that nobody actually has an issue with. A few 2007 owners had fuel pump issues, which were easily handled. I hardly think that this vehicle has problems.themadscientist wrote: I don't know why the Versa seems to be giving you guys all this trouble and it's kind of ridiculous when Tidda's seem to run like a top, you have a right to get pissed.
Give me a break. Comparing a RWD coupe to the plight of the Versa is nonsense.silverarrow27 wrote:Just because it was rwd to begin with didn't mean it was logical to modify it; I was in that era and mostly everyone was pretty much saying the same thing the Versa is getting now. This is just part of a car's live...ugly duckling turns into a beautiful swan.
So why wouldn't you count the Mazda3? The 2.3L isn't stunningly powerful stock at 156hp, but it is an infinitely more sporting vehicle than the Versa. Trust me, I own both. I also happen to still love the Versa for what it is.SuperTurbo wrote:Look at the market now, how many Wagon or Hatch with big power, and it's Automatic?? I would say it's zero if you don't count Mazda 3 in
I mainly meant the way the car came and the aftermarket. Until you saw SR swaps, there really wasn't an aftermarket for the 240SX. After SR swaps came the KA-T's, RB's, LSX's, e.t.c. All I was saying was there wasn't much in the way of aftermarket for the 240 like there was for the Integra/Civic/ Any other Honda.Rockhound wrote:
Give me a break. Comparing a RWD coupe to the plight of the Versa is nonsense.
The only people 'saying the same thing' about the 240SX were likely under 20 years old and too busy looking for tire melting acceleration instead of just enjoying the car for what it was. The 240SX had a following from the outset from folks who wanted a sensible driver's car. Believe it or not, there are plenty of folks out there who value handling over sheer power. It's just that they're usually just more mature, i.e. not teenagers.
The 240SX just needed a little more oomph to make it an all-around sporty coupe - the capable chassis and driveline was already there. The Versa is a 1.8L-powered front-drive hatch/sedan with absolutely no sporty intentions. Apples to oranges.
So why wouldn't you count the Mazda3? The 2.3L isn't stunningly powerful stock at 156hp, but it is an infinitely more sporting vehicle than the Versa. Trust me, I own both. I also happen to still love the Versa for what it is.
... whoever made this s/n - this was completely unnecessary.skyliner34gtrmightyversa wrote:I love to suck d!ck in Canadian truck stop restrooms.
I wasn't even comparing the Versa to the 240sx. It was more of an example and personal life experience of how the 240sx use to be "like" the Versa, where as most people thought it had no balls even with the ka24e or the ka24de. Not up until the ca18det, sr20det, KA-T, RB series, LSx, VG, VQ, and VH's came along that people really enjoyed their cars much more. Why only have one when you can have both though?Rockhound wrote:
Give me a break. Comparing a RWD coupe to the plight of the Versa is nonsense.
The only people 'saying the same thing' about the 240SX were likely under 20 years old and too busy looking for tire melting acceleration instead of just enjoying the car for what it was. The 240SX had a following from the outset from folks who wanted a sensible driver's car. Believe it or not, there are plenty of folks out there who value handling over sheer power. It's just that they're usually just more mature, i.e. not teenagers.
The 240SX just needed a little more oomph to make it an all-around sporty coupe - the capable chassis and driveline was already there. The Versa is a 1.8L-powered front-drive hatch/sedan with absolutely no sporty intentions. Apples to oranges.
More than the haciroku had from Toyota. My old Silvia dynoed at 150 to the wheels and I could still piss people off with it.SuperTurbo wrote:Rochhound:
You actually mention 1 point already.... it's powerful, but NOT that powerful. (But somehow some PPL still consider 160HP is a lot for a small car, that's pretty much the reason why I mention that)