Post by
SmithSR »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/smithsr-u5241.html
Wed Jun 25, 2003 8:59 am
Greg, 280 vs. 360 treadwear isn't much, but it ain't nothin. I know you're a car guy, so I'll assume you're in tune with the nuances of your car's handling/grip characteristics. While a traction rating is provided for each tire, the treadwear rating also speaks to the rubber compound in the tire. Soft compound gives better grip, the down-side is fewer miles per dollar. Harder compound gives less grip, but you get more miles. These are big generalizations, but in my opinion, the base concept stays constant. So, assuming a few things such as proper balance, proper alignment, no oddball problems with tire construction, I'd say you *may* notice a difference in grip characteristics of your car if you opt for the Falkens. Either way, any difference that you DO notice will be very minor. For me, grip is more important than high mileage, but your needs may be different, as you've got a family to feed, clothe, and house. I still think the Falken is a good all around tire, and worth trying out on your car. It's not a gamble, just an opportunity to try a new tire.
After staring at Q45tech's post for the past ten minutes(I've found it beneficial to memorize what he says:bowdown), it sounds to me like he's suggesting the softer compound Yoko tire, to maintain near-OEM stopping characteristics, but sacrifice higher mileage. That may be obvious to everybody but me; it's late...if Q45tech sees an error in my thinking on this, I give you full permission to pummel me with a baseball bat.
P.S. When Les Schwab Tire Center expands into Arizona, I'll be applying for a transfer. Some day I'll have a tan, and God willing I will see the Q with my own eyes.
