Post by
Sukesada »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/sukesada-u51150.html
Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:36 am
I've been reading these Nissan and 240SX forums religiously for weeks now, looking for insights regarding forced induction, exhaust, intake, and other street mods that are worthwhile for improved performance and handling characteristics.
I love the KA. My mechanic first suggested that I consider a swap for an SR or even an RB, but that would be like a soul transplant. When she dies, I'll consider reincarnation, but not before. Besides with the XTerra and Altima using the KA, I should be able to grab a low mileage engine for years to come. The 240SX is a classic and I intend to drive my girl until she's a legal antique (2023) and then some. My best friend got 280K miles on his Maxima and then sold it for $2500. I've babied mine through 133K and I can see no reason why another 130K+ isn't there.
Things I have observed in reading these forums:
Most pundits agree that it costs far more and is a lot more difficult to get meaningful gains in power from NA mods to the KA than by going with forced induction. By the time that you include all the parts and the tuning involved, its a major undertaking.
The virulence of despite for electric superchargers is simply breathtaking, but almost none of these haters has any first hand knowledge of the subject, particularly as it relates to the 240SX. That combination of vehemence and ignorance I really cannot abide. These people seem to become hysterical over the mere existence of a thread discussing a subject that they consider closed - even though their knowledge of the subject is at best second hand and very limited in scope. You see that in all kinds of forums. I think psychiatry should examine online behaviors for new sub-classifications of obsession neuroses.
Most pundits agree that 6 - 8 psi boost about the most that stock engines can take without some serious tuning.
Most agree that the fuel controller is mainly what needs correction, not so much the engine guts, which are frequently touted as being surprisingly robust. Somewhere around 300 hp most pundits contend that you need to start considering internals (pistons, rods, cams, etc.), although the views differ greatly as to what is weaker or stronger and at what point you should be concerned. I am staying out of that territory, so I really don't care.
Opinions differ over whether you need an intercooler for low boost, ~200 - 225 hp conversions. My mechanic says going turbo without FMIC is not worth the effort. I am concerned about adequate engine cooling with a big IC blocking the radiator, but I haven't seen much discussion of that topic. I am far more concerned about overheating the engine than overheating the turbo or losing some fraction of thermal efficiency.
No one seems to have much to say on the subject of fuel efficiency post-turbo. I got 29 mpg HWY before the EVO TT was installed. I haven't checked it since. In theory it should improve slightly, as would be true for the intake. But a turbo that draws more fuel to compensate for more air will get worse mileage - at least while under boost. On the other hand, a turbo-supercharger is more efficient in producing power and should get you going faster with less fuel than a naturally aspirated engine (ie, the time under acceleration will be less). So, I wonder if it will be about the same or conspicuously worse? Again, I am talking about normal driving with no changes.
There's an online article for the GReddy kit, so I guess that counts, but I'd like to see an install writeup by someone who isn't afraid of losing ad money from a major sponsor. You know? I haven't yet seen a case of someone installing a Turbonetics kit.
PS-- Thanks for the welcome WD!
Modified by Sukesada at 4:42 PM 11/25/2006
Modified by Sukesada at 5:51 PM 11/25/2006