jschrauwen wrote:1. I get the distinct impression that carcrazyguy advocates stock and only stock suspension replacement parts.
2. Advocating oem...will more than likely fall on deaf ears.
3. I'd like to think that with more than 20 years since the first Z32 rolled out, that there have been enough progress and improvements in design and manufacture of suspension parts, even for the Z32.
1.. LOL, Actually, I never said that, meant that, etc. But Z-owned slickly gave me that characteristic a couple replies back...which apparently worked to make others assume that too. I know you are a pretty sharp guy...so even if Z-owned doesn't know anything about the technical aspects of things, I see he is pretty good at argument winning techniques...for example him saying I could not be taken seriously due to a slang (Deutsch) word being used.
But to clear things up, I will go on record as saying I do prefer (new) OEM over mix and match suspension upgrading. My original point (that got slurred by superslick Z-owned) is that at least if a person replaces all worn parts with OE items, they will have a perfectly balanced, well handling car. By comparison, buying shock A and spring B and so on will produce quite unpredictable, and often unexpected results. But give me, say, the (equivalent of) the SMZ suspension on a TT, that would be a different story, lol.
2. Yes, I agree, as there is one stiff rule on forums. What one did is always best - and will be defended to the end. So anyone that either has done the modification in question, or dreams of it, they will be absolutely deaf to even the most logical argument.
3. You would think...but not really. Read engineering trades, articles, etc. in the past decade in these areas. Heck, even the 350 and 370Z suspensions are tightly based on the Z32 multi-link design with no major engineering changes...well, other than those necessary to suit the differing vehicle.
Also, notice that new vehicles (other than exotics) aren't turning the g's that RX7's, Z's, Supra, etc. did in the mid 90's. Sure, some of this is financial, but in these areas, progress has hit the proverbial wall...just as physics itself has (other than maybe select Quantum theories).
But even if there was a major development made, this is not going to translate into aftermarket shocks and springs, and especially not a discovery an Ebay or multi-shock company has found and is keeping from the world.
A progressive development would however, be seen in a whole new design (similar to what multi-link, wishbone, etc was in the 80's). But "performance" replacement shocks, springs, etc. are basically the same part that have been around for decades, with only differing rates, etc. and along the same lines, math has not varied much either. But I do hear that statement said often on forums...usually when people justify an expensive ECU upgrade on an NA for example. And I do know how "sold" on that concept people are...as it will cleanly and often completely justify any upgrade...or motivate those that might be on the fence. So if ears remain deaf...so be it.