good call on the red one. 5ish-6ish is reasonable. and 9+ sounds about right for a TT, depending of course.Bohemiangod wrote:The red N/A seems like its a bit to high in price. Around here in Florida, a N/A is worth around 5 and a TT is worth 9+. The Green TT has the details "Great for Drifting" which would make me worry about the frames condition. And the white one looks decent. Any other opinions?
Plus...in the collector and enthusiast marketplace no one wants a 2+2. I have seen super clean 2+2's sell for much less and rough 2 seaters. The appeal for a longer, heavier, nonturbo car with a non functional back seat just isn't there.freakonaleash1187 wrote:Out of the Z's you listed, I would honestly keep looking. If the red 2+2 was selling for about $7k, I would be interested in it, but $8700 is quite a bit for a 2+2.
Exactly.nsrZ32 wrote:Plus...in the collector and enthusiast marketplace no one wants a 2+2. I have seen super clean 2+2's sell for much less and rough 2 seaters. The appeal for a longer, heavier, nonturbo car with a non functional back seat just isn't there.
Yep, TT slicktops would be the way to go for a track dedicated car as they're about 200lbs lighter than the 2 seaters. But in all reality a slicktop is just a bare bones base model Z32. IMO T-tops are more fun anywayfreakonaleash1187 wrote:But then again, TT swap in mind, if you find a slicktop, GRAB IT! A slicktop is the lightest of all the Z's and to my knowledge, there was never a slicktop TT sold anywhere in the world.
A Z32 without T-tops. Bare bones stripped down base model. They didn't make a lot of them because everybody wanted T-tops. They are coveted by some people due to the slight weight advantage but they aren't a special version or anything. Just differentphanatikz32 wrote:by the way wuts a slicktop?