AznRide wrote:SRT-4 runs 14 all day at the track last weekend. I ran 13.2 and I paid less than what I would have paid for the SRT-4. I would say go for the 240sx, much better car to ride in.
I vote SRT-4 now, 240SX later. Sure, your 240SX runs low 13's, but what happens when something breaks? Is Nissan going to fix it under warranty?
Don't think so.
The SRT-4 starts out STOCK with ~230hp *to the wheels* and a Quaife limited slip differential. If you get one now, you get a 7/70 powertrain warranty (heard all SRT vehicles will lose the 7/70 soon, not sure on the validity of that...).
I can't believe how many people regurgitate the "it's a straight line performer" line. Consider this, SCC managed .85g on the skidpad and 69mph in the 700' slalom. That ain't too shabby.
BTW, the '04 WRX pulled .84g and 67.4mph in the slalom. The only FWD car I've seen that put up numbers better than the SRT-4 on the skid pad and slalom was the Mazdaspeed Protege.
I'm not saying the SRT-4 is without flaws, and if I had to choose between a 350Z and an SRT-4, I'd go Z 100%. If I were choosing between a WRX and an SRT-4 I'd have some serious thinkin' to do.
If *you* like the car enough to take on $20K+ in car payments, I say go for it. I don't think it's a good idea to get a 240SX with the intent of making it your sole daily driver AND a major project car.
If you do think you want an SRT-4, I recommend you get some insurance quotes first, especially if you're under 25. It's not a cheap vehicle to insure.