PLEASE let this myth die guys. I have a set of CA18DET cams, CA18DE cams, and CA16DE cams (in my garage. right now.), and they all look identical. Hell I had to break out the micrometer to verify that there WAS a difference. Is something so small worth pulling apart your head for?boost_boy wrote:Don't go throught the hassle of chasing down a CA16DE's camshaft because it's not worth the amount of work you're going to go through to put it in your engine. Go and get a set of regrinds or a set of name brand units with better profiles. CA16 cams suck monkey balls. It's an illusion that will hurt you in the torque department.
Dee
fraz wrote:DET camsintake: 8mm,240degexh:8.5mm,248deg
CA18dein:8.5mm,240degexh:8.5mm,248deg
CA16dein:8.5mm,248degexh:8.5mm,248deg
So by running the ca16de cam versus the ca18de cam, you are only gaining 8deg.
You can just use a exhaust cam from any CA twin cam in the intake to get the same lift and duration
1. Talk to cuzan0, He's got 256's in his CA and it idle fine. I think you can even go to a 264 and still have good idle. Most of these aftermarket cams don't have the crazy lift that the V8 cams do, so idle isn't as adversly effected.2. Granted. I don't like spending crazy money either, BUT what I hate more is to see people spending money on a modification that will get them practically no gain in performance.3. See #24. Simma dan na! Everybody loves me and I don't care what everybody says! Hehehehrico05 wrote:1) Don't want crap idle2) Don't want to shell out a ton of $ for HKS, etc3) Modest power goals4) NEWS FLASH: No one cares what you think Ryan