Bwahaha.AZhitman wrote:Did anyone notice theyre predominantly WHITE? Unions must be a racist group. After all, thats what they said about the Tea Party.
Yes there are...AppleBonker wrote:Bwahaha.AZhitman wrote:Did anyone notice theyre predominantly WHITE? Unions must be a racist group. After all, thats what they said about the Tea Party.
Honest question: Is anybody in Wisconsin not white?
The unions in my area are predominantly white. Then again, my area is something like 95% white, so that figures...
Hooray red state!
i for one, still blame palin. she was reckless in her evoking gun imagry, no amount of shouting on the part of the GOP will change that she literally placed BULLSEYES on the districts of those who she disagreed with, of which Giffords was one.AZhitman wrote:"Of course I'm not an advocate of deadly force against people expressing their views, that's wrong. It's so ridiculous, I can't believe anyone took it literally," Cox said.
Really? YOU DOUCHE. I'll bet you were one of the premature bigmouths that spouted off blaming Palin for the Tucson shootings.
So, WE are all "ridiculous" because YOU can't control your yammering manpleaser?
I hope he winds up living under a bridge, if only to serve as an example to other hypocritical gasbag lefties who spew nonsense then cower when they get called on the carpet. STAND UP for what you said or go hang yourself.
Now - When will Capuano be fired? Hmmmm?
AZhitman wrote:
...I hope he winds up living under a bridge, if only to serve as an example to other hypocritical gasbag lefties who spew nonsense then cower when they get called on the carpet. STAND UP for what you said or go hang yourself....
OMG. BECAUSE they're not allowed!!!!! You guys whine and complain. Hell, they can't say, "God bless you" or "Jesus loves you" or "Merry Christmas" or "don't kill babies" or "Abu Nidal is a radical Muslim terrorlst" or "yes, I'm a gun enthusiast" or "I like to eat meat" or "Women and children first" or "peace through strength" or "Che Guevara was a bum loser"... Or any other number of things that conservatives believe. They get crucified by the liberal media.heliochrome85 wrote:i for one, still blame palin.
You would. Never mind the fact that we've already established that NOTHING happened as a result. NOTHING.
You may as well have blamed Nick Cage. I mean, he put a pantyhose on his head and waved an unloaded gun at a convenience store clerk in a movie that portrayed rural Arizona. Blame him. Right? No? Why not?
heliochrome85 wrote:also, as for standing up, when was the last time you heard the GOP stand up and actually state their beliefs
I stand VERY corrected. Thanks Steve.srellim234 wrote:AZ, you should have identified them as "hypocritical gasbags from both sides".
Not sure WHICH "side" this nozzle is on, but he needs to be arrested too:srellim234 wrote:AZ, you should have identified them as "hypocritical gasbags from both sides".
AZhitman wrote:
OMG. BECAUSE they're not allowed!!!!! You guys whine and complain. Hell, they can't say, "God bless you" or "Jesus loves you" or "Merry Christmas" or "don't kill babies" or "Abu Nidal is a radical Muslim terrorlst" or "yes, I'm a gun enthusiast" or "I like to eat meat" or "Women and children first" or "peace through strength" or "Che Guevara was a bum loser"... Or any other number of things that conservatives believe. They get crucified by the liberal media.
But it works out just dandy for you, so by all means, enjoy.
They have been, Greg, but they've been met with a brick wall.AZhitman wrote:By the way, if the Union is so strong, why aren't THEY handling negotiations? Why does it have to come down to an angry mob? Looks to me like their "fat-cat union reps" are sitting home, counting their money.
NYTimes wrote:Already, the union has agreed to Mr. Walker’s demands to have public employees pay more toward their pensions and health coverage, translating into a 7 percent cut in pay.
Those concessions drew a moment of gloating from Mr. Walker at a Monday news conference. “That’s an interesting development, because a week ago they said that’s not acceptable,” he said.
I don't care for Lugar and I'm not a Tea Partier. I tried to send him a nasty-gram once and every listed email of his bounced back.heliochrome85 wrote:AZhitman wrote: the gop is not allowed to state their beliefs because the liberal media will crucify them? I dont see anyone crucifying d*** Lugar except members of the Tea Party? Is there any doubt that he is a real conservative?
I would take an Armenian over a real dirty Turk any day. But dont get me started.heliochrome85 wrote:also, as for standing up, when was the last time you heard the GOP stand up and actually state their beliefs rather than saying that the LEFT was the source of all evil and socialism? Its like me saying, "DONT ELECT GREG, HE IS A DIRTY ARMENIAN WHO ISNT FIT TO RUN THIS COUNTRY." what i believe in becomes irrelevant since whatever i am cant possibly be as bad as what the opponent is.
Bayh's office wasnt any better. I sent him letters and emails to implore him to save Indiana jobs by striking (amending) out the Student Lending legislation in the Obama Health Care Reform bill. I got a lousy email a month later, thanking me for my email and if I should want to talk to his office to call. Same thing happened when CNN was airing sniper videos of our troops being shot in Iraq.audtatious wrote:don't care for Lugar and I'm not a Tea Partier. I tried to send him a nasty-gram once and every listed email of his bounced back.
Cold_Zero wrote:I would take an Armenian over a real dirty Turk any day. But dont get me started.heliochrome85 wrote:also, as for standing up, when was the last time you heard the GOP stand up and actually state their beliefs rather than saying that the LEFT was the source of all evil and socialism? Its like me saying, "DONT ELECT GREG, HE IS A DIRTY ARMENIAN WHO ISNT FIT TO RUN THIS COUNTRY." what i believe in becomes irrelevant since whatever i am cant possibly be as bad as what the opponent is.
Keep it between the ditches, AA.heliochrome85 wrote:the gop is not allowed to state their beliefs because the liberal media will crucify them? I dont see anyone crucifying d*** Lugar except members of the Tea Party? Is there any doubt that he is a real conservative?
stebo0728 wrote: Its amazing though, how people unconcerned with others welfare, and only concerned with their own betterment, usually benefit society the most, through the innovation they produce in bettering themselves.
My good man. One who places cross hairs on the image of a person can reasonably be seen as targeting that subject. Whether or not such targeting included an implied or actual threat of violence is yet another discussion. Considering the limited mental facilities of our Alaskan playmate, I'd suggest that neither possibility is realistic, however, drawing such a conclusion isn't beyond reason.AZhitman wrote:
Really? YOU DOUCHE. I'll bet you were one of the premature bigmouths that spouted off blaming Palin for the Tucson shootings.
If you can show me where that happened, I'll concede.R/T Hemi wrote: My good man. One who places cross hairs on the image of a person can reasonably be seen as targeting that subject.

R/T Hemi wrote:[Considering the limited mental facilities of our Alaskan playmate, I'd suggest that neither possibility is realistic, however, drawing such a conclusion isn't beyond reason.
Stebo, that's the second time you've tried to make this absurd justification. What the hell, dude. Why is it so hard to acknowledge that a political nobody getting more attention than she's worth did something stupid and inconsiderate?stebo0728 wrote:Wait wait, first of all, the actual symbol Palin used was a surveyor mark. Argue if you like whether it resembled a crosshair, but secondly it was placed on spots on a US map, NOT on a persons head. Lets be clear before we point fingers.