I am pretty sure all 90-96Q factory wheels are 6.5 inches wide, NOT 6.0Q451990 wrote:The offset is the same as the OEM wheels, but you're 1/2" wider.
So:
-1991 OEM 15x6 45mm-your wheel 16x6.5 45mm-1997 OEM 16x7 40mm
I'm running the 1997 OEM wheels on my '90 and have had no rubbing issues. Just be careful that your target wheels have a sufficient load handling capicity to stand up to the abuse the heavy Q with it's negative camber dishes out. Same for the tires.
Here's a nice calculator that makes it easy to see what different wheel offsets will get you as compared to your current wheels. http://marksink.com/tire_wheel_offset/offset.html
Heath
Modified by Q451990 at 2:32 AM 8/23/2009
long story short, you should be OK to run those... as heath said!1991q45 wrote:i seen a set of wheels 16 x 6.5.the wheel offset i belive is 45mm.there was a post sating it was okay bu a couple of other people said that it was'nt correct.
so is it fine to run 16" wheels with an offset of 45?
Interesting as those are forged. I don't recall you mentioning you had actually mounted them. Which tires? Did the wheels bend in that 6 month period? I ask because I am certain you spun them up and measured lateral and radial run out (you had rejected some previously for not meeting OEM specifications), so I wonder how much they changed?Q45tech wrote:I tried 300zx 16 x 8 wheels as an experiment. They seemed to bend much faster than Q oem so I sold them within 6 months. Obviously they were designed for a lighter vehicle.
Provided, as Q45tech says, you confirm they meet OEM specifications as published in the FSM. Any used wheel or cheap wheel should be verified as still within dynamic balance and run out specification, provided it is structurally sound. Moving used parts are always a crap shoot.elwesso wrote:long story short, you should be OK to run those... as heath said!
You're absolutely right... just checked that owner's manual again. Just corrected it in my other post too.qship96 wrote:I am pretty sure all 90-96Q factory wheels are 6.5 inches wide, NOT 6.0
Especially considering that outside diameter unloaded (which the calculator works with) is not the same as loaded outside diameter. I'd bet those two wheels are nearly identical in height once under the weight of the Q. With lower profile tires that's not always the case, but with 60+ aspect ratio tires you're looking at a lot of "squash" at the contact patch. The variance is probably less than an eighth of an inch. Not enough to even affect the speedo noticably.Q451990 wrote:The new tires are .6 inches larger in diameter than the stock ones. Which is a minimal difference... especially if you're getting these for free.
I'd say you can slam those things on there and youll be all set, should be perfect! Take some pictures..1991q45 wrote:
the tires that are on the 16's are goodyears...brand new. 225/60/r16. i should go with something smaller?