Wheel decision (all Konig)

[240-SRT-4]

Srt-4's are like the emo quiet kids in school that sits in the corner wearing makeup and hiss at you when you look at them

haha.. that's a good one.. but as far as the WRX > SRT-4.. i have to disagree... I've owned a STI.. yeah it was awesome.. but it's not really the WRX.. theres alot more bout the WRX that sucks.. but what makes it better is the AWD... so its just that the AWD > FWD

now as for the EVO.. it is a car GOD in my book.. the 4g63 is a bad @ss motor.. and the old awd talons are like the baby Jesus.. lol

And I also have a 69 Z/28 which was one of the greatest muscle cars of all time.. and it was suppose to have 290hp but actually dynoed at almost 400hp...

And my last ? is since it was said that the 4 banger turbo neon cant be considered but the V8 cars of yesterday were american muscle because of there engine?

Does that mean the Turbo V6 GRAND NATIONAL is not a muscle car???

[matzinm2]

The Grand National and GNX were original demi-gods in their own way, they changed the way people looked at "muscle". So I agree, it doesn't matter what size the engine is... yet, the GNX did have torque, just like every other muscle car in the books, and the SRT-4 I drove... well, had no torque, yet it DID go fast in a straight line. Muscle cars in my book go fast in a straight line, involve "slam you back in your seat" torque, and the evil, rumbly, big, American look.

SRT-4=understeer. that is all I have to say about that.

Although it is a clean car you've got.

as far as Konigs go, (OP) you get what you pay for. But in the end, go with your own style.

There are so many WRX's and EVO's and STI's out there because they are GOOD cars, not because they suck. The boxer engine is a very good design, as is the EVO engine, so this thread could argue with itself all day about which is better. They are simply good cars.
Modified by matzinm2 at 12:11 AM 7/22/2009