I would't get in a Lexus if it was the last car on earth. Dunno why but I just dislike them Just like Furds. Must be pre wired in me or somthing.qship96 wrote:Hate Lexus??? go drive a new LS460L and report back. While too small for me, the Is350 or 5.o liter Is-F is a screamer with performance numbers to give a BMW M series a serious run for the money and reliability the Germans only dream about.
Thanks for the insight. I drove a stock 97 Q45 and the ride was the same if not better than my 97 Q45T. That is why I wanted to know the actual differences between the 2. Maybe the smaller wheels of the stock 97 Q give a more luxury ride.EASTSiDE 2 WESTSiDE wrote:Well I personally have got into a accident in my 97 Q45 the front end was smashed to the point my hood, fenders, rebar, headlights and even radiator was smashed. I was cut off by a car doing about 50 and walked away without a scratch. I loved the car so much ended up rebuilding the front end to a 2001 with Xenon lights, hood and all. Personally I like the fact it has the Complete wood dash not the big Black part around the radio, the Rear end has the full tail lights. Only different to me is the newer hood extends over the wipers and the wood steering wheel option. Otherwise both have fairly the same options and just have replacement parts nothing is a major change and I have drove a 2000 Q45 and never noticed a difference. I think its all hype about the real difference. car now has 105,000 Miles and still running great slammed on 20's and still waiting for a major issue but aslong as you keep up on it and dont beat on the car it will run just great.
Not to be off topic the Q45 and Q45T has different options but the main cosmetic is wheels and a odd looking spolier.
Don't know your year since your profile is incomplete, but all the wood in "the complete wood dash" is actually plastic. Only the maple in the 2000 ae and 2001 models is real. Personally, I prefer the fake as I find the maple a little garishly yellow.EASTSiDE 2 WESTSiDE wrote:Personally I like the fact it has the Complete wood dash not the big Black part around the radio....,
Me too! I guess real Maple was the wrong choice of woods. A black Walnut is more close to the plastic dash trim in the 97 Qmaxnix wrote:Don't know your year since your profile is incomplete, but all the wood in "the complete wood dash" is actually plastic. Only the maple in the 2000 ae and 2001 models is real. Personally, I prefer the fake as I find the maple a little garishly yellow.
Yea, I like the 97 rear end also, especially with that whale tail spoiler. I am very happy with my 97Q45t right now. I had to change the rims cause those rims exclusive to the q45t were butt ugly. It is amazing how different the 97Q looks with some great rims. So I would advise anyone that wants to bring a 2nd Gen Q up to date to invest in some modern rims. I just replaced the tension rods and stabilizer bars on my car and it rides like new now. I can now appreciate the stiffer ride of the q45t versus the cushy standard Q.The black grill is unique but what really sets the car off is the Cima hood ornament that I put on. If you can find one of those hood ornaments it is also a great investment for your ride.BadQ45t wrote:Okay, I have a 97t and it is a wonderful car. The diff between it and a 2000 is not all that much, but I do like some stuff but I prefer the rear on my 97.
So to address this guys question:
Touring had stiffer shocks, springs, blackout grill, leather perf'ed leather steering wheel and different rims. There were 16" and 17" rims available that were different then the regular ones. Finally the integrated spoiler was included as well.
That was it, I drove the standard and touring back to back and it was noticable at the time. I since have replaced both springs and shocks anyways, but the 97's is a VERY solid car provided that the owner took good care of it. I have owned mine since 2000 and have 92K on it and have had ZERO issues....it has airbags and a good frame.
If your looking for a 2nd gen I wouldn't steer away from a 97' if you found a good one. For example, mine is 50X better then most of them out there, fluid changes and flushes, all sych fluids since I owned it. I do like the analog clock and some other stuff, but at this point these cars are all older so get the best maintained one....the 97' was darn good and if you saw mine you'd agree.
You mean 1000 right? Ha ha, just checking. Yea, I would like to lower my car to get better handling and of course it looks much better sitting a bit lower.. I just don't know enough about the KYB SR Specials and what they bring to the table. Maybe someone can enlighten me. I would like to add air suspension and just lower the car at the flip of a button. My dad had a Citroen with the hydraulic suspension and that car had an amazing ride. When in park that car would sit real low.BadQ45t wrote:Agreed, I got rid of the 16" rims it came with in favor of some 17" ones...they were too hard to balance so I dumped those in favor of the 06' M45 Sport rims. It required spacers but oh they were worth it 19" with 245/35 19" YR rated tires.
I did the tension rods too at the same time I replaced the shocks and springs. I love the way the rear of my 97' looks much better then the 2000 Anniv. Edition...but like some of the updates on the interior.
BTW, the touring is hard to find, I wouldn't worry so much about that, find one that is in great shape, the best shape you can find. For $1 you can add lowering springs (or buy new springs) and KYB SR Specials that will make it handle way better then any stock Touring. Find condition first with great history of work.