My 92 FSM says I have the sodium valves so they may have be around for a while. I find it somewhat hard to believe that a 90 is gonna be more performance oriented than my 92. My perception is that it's certainly a drivers car priority one, then a luxury car second.hardmoney wrote:yes, Ive read many times that there were real changes in hard parts. As I said before the Sodium filled valves I dont think stuck around very long, Ive read a few times and conversed with Rex Birkmire about the different fuel rails in the 1990 model year and I recall reading other posts concerning internal engine parts constructed from exotic metals(
Yep sodium filled valves for the 90-92, 93-95 lost those, and 96 lost vvtFlagship-Q wrote: My 92 FSM says I have the sodium valves so they may have be around for a while. I find it somewhat hard to believe that a 90 is gonna be more performance oriented than my 92. My perception is that it's certainly a drivers car priority one, then a luxury car second.
Agreed. I owned a 91 and a 95. There was a definite difference between the two - and I prefered the 91 for sure. Better steering. Felt quicker. More nimble, etc.Jesda wrote:I've driven two 90s, a couple 91s, and a couple 92s.The whole car (1990), from steering to suspension, felt tighter and beefier, and subsequently a little less luxurious/at ease. You can immediately feel the difference. The '90 feels sportier.
My 1972 Alfa has sodium filled exhaust valves, and I know titanium connectig rods were an option on the same year 911S.hardmoney wrote:yes, Ive read many times that there were real changes in hard parts. As I said before the Sodium filled valves I dont think stuck around very long, Ive read a few times and conversed with Rex Birkmire about the different fuel rails in the 1990 model year and I recall reading other posts concerning internal engine parts constructed from exotic metals(titanium,back when titanium was still something people thought was mined on the planet Krypton) and exacting measurements(I remember Q45tech once saying the cylinder walls were machined within 1/10000 of an inch,just like Ferrari). The steering is definitely different from other Q's Ive driven, however the suspension would be a hard one to restore considering those shocks probably havent been made in 12-15 years,doesnt matter anyway they are probably equivalent to Tokico blacks after about 15-20k. My Black Q45 was made in 11/89, when was production started?Also my black Q45 came with different wheels that Ive only seen on Very early 1990 T cars and JDM Q45's and pre-production magazines, much better looking than the pie pans they threw on later.
Well they're filled with sodium ...nuQ wrote: for us dummy's here,,,,,what exactly is so special with "sodium filled valves"??????
Yes, please tell us about this Q. That mileage is absolutely amazing.... thought it might be a typo.Jesda wrote:422k.... good LORD!
I think I recall reading somewhere that he's on his 2nd engine/3rd transmission. First motor lasted 220k on the original chain guides ... but this is just testing my memory.Jesda wrote:422k.... good LORD!
elwesso, can you tell me if a 1990 Q45 ECU that reads "01" "A18-A21 P01" "9 x 09" used traction control or not? much loveelwesso wrote:You could get me the numbers off the engine and I could tell you what year it is, there should be apart number on there somewhere.