The NA has higher compression. The turbo motor has less compression because less is needed due to the increased air density created by using compressed air via forced induction.96SoftTop wrote:Wait, are you saying that the N/A has higher compression that the TT? That doesn't sound right, but I could be (very) wrong.
Ken
5k not 15kevildky wrote:you can get a front cut for well under 5k, turboing the n/a engine is a more intermeidate project than the swap, it can be doen if you knwo what you are doing.....no offence but, it would appear that you do not
you have 15k total to spend and can't find a TT? are you blind? they are all over the place, you can get a decent TT for about 10K and still have money for mods, are you trying to buy one with under 60k miles or something? are you looking for cars more than a mile from your house? for 15k you can get a 350Z
OK, I can sort-of understand that, but then, well crap...tg wrote:
The NA has higher compression. The turbo motor has less compression because less is needed due to the increased air density created by using compressed air via forced induction.
tg wrote:The NA has higher compression. The turbo motor has less compression because less is needed due to the increased air density created by using compressed air via forced induction.
I believe you, and trust younsrZ32 wrote:Forced induction = more pressure in the cylinders. That's the whole idea of forced induction (forcing as much air as possible in) and thus you need higher octane.
Its a very simple thing actually.
Also, I realize that a lot of you are new to Z's and have a lot of ideas and question about what if or why not....So trust us when we tell you something. We're not trying to be ***holes
Yeah. And I am NOT trying to be a smart ***.nsrZ32 wrote:The NA has a higher compression ratio than the TT. But, as stated, turbos force air into the cylinders thus more densely packing in the air and adding to the volume in a sense and thus more is compressed. I'm trying to keep this as basic as possible so not to confuse. You understand how compression ratios are figured and how forced induction functions correct?
And that just didn't sound right to me....nsrZ32 wrote:The NA has a higher compression ratio than the TT.