Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Look around, offset calculators are easy to find.
If you don't mind me asking, why are you putting such wide wheels on your car?
StephenB wrote:I want to get 17X9s in the front and 17X10s in the rear. I'd like to know what offset is needed for these. I own a 97 base model 240sx. I'm probably going to need to do the 5lug swap to use these, unless someone knows of wheels in these sizes that are available in 4-lug. If I can't fit 10s in the rear, someone let me know what the largest size I can fit is, thanks!
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:You keep changing your story. Perhaps we're not being clear enough with you.
"It's a drag car, I'm putting a huge turbo on it."
If you put 9" or 10" wide tires on your car, it's going to be difficult to steer, unreliable, and slower. If you're planning on putting 1000hp to the ground and you're going to be trailering the car to the drag strip on the weekends, this might be worth doing.
Of course, if that's the case, you should probably use a Mustang or a Camaro instead. It's a heck of a lot easier/cheaper to get to 1000hp with eight cylinders instead of four.
"It's a street car, too."
Then you shouldn't put enormous tires on it. You're never going to be able to make the kind of power that tires that large would warrant streetable.
Also, unless you're planning on spending large amounts of money on super lightweight wheels, 18" wheels are just going to slow you down.
Lost_To_A_K-Car wrote:Originally posted by StephenB "]I think I'm not being clear with you,
Well, be clearer, then. You've said "the car will be made for strait (sic) lines", strongly implying a drag car, and you've also said "its a street car too". These two statements are contradictory.
Are you building a dedicated drag strip car that will never be driven on the road, or are you building a car that you intend to drive around and drag on the weekends?
hence the reason your replying with an atitude like I don't know what I'm talking about.
Your inexplicable desire to put nine or ten inch wheels on a 240 indicates that you don't know what you're talking about. You also don't seem to know how to measure, which doesn't do much for your credibility. I am very open to being proven wrong, though.
Also, I'd go with a camaro or mustang, but Mustangs (unless its the 5.0 boxy bastards) wont do **** lower than 12 with anything less than 30 thousand in them, is that cheaper?
I think you're going to be hard pressed to get a 240 under well 12 seconds (and and have it streetable and not have to rebuild it every six months) for less than that.
If you think that's off, ask Larry at MV Autos, he used to own a 95 5.0 (last year I beleive, might be a 94) and had about that in his, and only ran mid 12s.
I'll be sure to bring that up with Larry next time I see him.