Post by
OM3GA »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/om3ga-u39603.html
Mon Feb 02, 2009 4:46 pm
Basically this is what i am afraid of and what i am trying to avoid
The majority of enthusiasts want a low ride height to fill the ugly gap in their stock wheel wells. They also won't accept a ride that, for the most part, is a lot harsher than stock. Macho or not, most enthusiasts don't drive hard enough or well enough to realize that their cars actually handle worse than stock, mistaking reduced roll for better handling.
On MacPherson strut-equipped cars, the wheel will gain negative camber under roll as long as the lower control arm is positioned less than 90 degrees relative to the strut axis. Unfortunately, many enthusiasts with MacPherson strut-equipped cars lower their cars too much and make this angle greater than 90 degrees. Beyond 90 degrees, the suspension will gain positive camber instead of negative as it compresses, significantly compromising grip
My Lca's are right now at 90 degrees however its not the look i want at all, and i want a PROPER way to lower it more than it is now however keeping the Lca's at 90 degrees whether that is obtained from longer ball joints or different lower control arms, i just dont understand exactly how the LCA's such as the Battle Version ones work with the adjustable roll center... I only see it being adjusted in and out but how does that help when the arms are still pointing sky high..