Post by
Chezedik »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/chezedik-u3691.html
Tue Oct 04, 2005 2:04 pm
No, that would be a bad compression reading, and with all due respect, that is because he is a GM mechanic. I do not mean that as an insult (at least outside of my own head), but they use cast iron rings rather than Chrome Moly like we do. The first thing about chrome moly is that they do not quickly set, but they are much harder. This could be detrimental to maintaining compression if the rings used spring tension to seal, like they do commonly in GM engines. But cast iron is less damaging to a block when cast iron are used. Long story short, we do not have (as) sprung rings, for better emissions. This gives longer ring and cyl wall life. Also, many of your small blocks (including GM 3.x and 4.3 liter) motors have low compression ratios. As low as 8:1, but not often above 9:1. Ours is at 9.5:1, this may not seem like much, but it really is. Look, my suggestion to you would be, if you are worried, or would like a second opinion you should find the FSM online. I know for a fact it is downloadable on PDF. And you should know that an engine would hardly run or want to start with compression that low. You would have to advance the crap out of it, and probably still use starting fluid. Just my $.02.