m4m,m4m wrote:I must say that overall, I am happy with my 2009 M. It is best value of sport, luxury and features for the money.
Here is My list of top 3 M complaints:
1. - Transmission throttle mapping seems confused at times, especially at slower speeds.
2. - Brakes (rotors and pads), had to go to dealer twice to resurface to get rid of vibration when brakes applied.
3. - Leather quality very low end, noticed driver seat cracks and creases happen WAY too fast, it looks like car has over 100k miles, instead of just 26K I have.
But once again, if you look at the price points, it's less expensive than the BMWs and Mercs. I guess the quality has to be sacrificed somewhere in order to lower the price. I'm not justifying them - I'm dissapointed with several of these types of things.
Well maybe not. If enough of us start whining and not buying the suits will get it and change. Not likely, but I am in a no buy mode regarding Infiniti's. Also in a no buy mode for BMW, Benz's, Audi's, Volvo, Lexus and a few others. Maybe I will go to Jag or Fords. Oh, I forgot, they are the same company now with different names. Maybe an old frame off restored car from the 60's to 70's is the ticket.merlinq2 wrote:Unfortunate that we agree
Not likely that enough sheeple will ever complain or stand their ground, anyway.myother45isalesbaer wrote:Well maybe not. If enough of us start whining and not buying the suits will get it and change. Not likely
I believe Ford sold Jag, I know they sold Aston Martin, Land Rover, and several other brands. Part of how they survived the recession without a bailout (and also part of how they started recovering / getting profitable, I guess). I also know their truck plant in Dearborn is pretty clean and quality oriented, unfortunately one can't know the same about all of their suppliers and I don't even know about their other plants. I would probably be driving a Ford if they weren't so behind the times when I was buying a car (for instance, on Lincoln: no power, no size, no luxury, same price tags). I believe they are changing that, though, and I have heard pretty good things about their ecoboost technology (and bad things about everyone's lighter thinner seats to help meet CAFE fuel economy requirements). Ford is changing the MKS to a smaller frame in the near future if they haven't already, but I'm sure that smaller frame is comparable to the M. I think that means the Germans are the only ones that still have a true full size option (outside of trucks/SUVs), but you have to be loaded to afford it, and VW is making the US Phaeton smaller, so it's possible Audi will follow suit on that.myother45isalesbaer wrote:Maybe I will go to Jag or Fords. Oh, I forgot, they are the same company now with different names. Maybe an old frame off restored car from the 60's to 70's is the ticket.
I know what you mean. If I enjoyed working on cars, could have a spare car, and didn't want certain creature comforts, I'd be leaning that way too.myother45isalesbaer wrote:I can't afford a BMW, Mercedes or an Audi the way I would like it configured. What I like about the older luxury cars is in CT they are registered as classics and exempt from all emissions, gas guzzler taxes, etc. I like the older T'Birds and Lincolns with the suicide doors. A completely restored one you can get for less than most of the new luxury sports sedans out there. True, they need more maintence than the new ones do, but that kind of maintence is a "do it yourself" and cheaper than the new cars are.
I believe you are the first person I have seen type this. I feel the same way, but figured I was just cynical as I have no good reason not to trust them and when I asked some time ago it seemed everyone was of the opinion that the transmission is a truck transmission that is extremely overbuilt and doesn't need worried about.Theo wrote:The defective seat issue is dangerous and another joke. The transmissions in the M are suspect in my opinion!
Sad but true. Overtime many brands of autos have come and gone. Time will tell if Infiniti can survive. Personally I am not even thinking about a new one. I guess I just will keep my 2004M until it dies and then take a look see at what else is out there.wingFeather wrote:Luxury started going downhill the day Lexus came online & advertised a car that looked (on the surface) like a Mercedes, but for half the price. Most people didn't understand heritage or engineering, so they stopped paying for it.
Ever since then, companies have been cutting quality because people didn't seem to care about it anymore. Why pay for 30 year durability when you'll only keep it for 2 to 5? Why pay for leather on the sides of the seat? Hey, why stop there? People won't notice that their $$$ car uses some of the same interior components as the cheapy Tercel (or Sentra in our case).
The poetic justice here is that Lexus is beginning to get bit in the a** by Kia & Hyundai, who are using their same tactics from decades earlier. Why pay for the Lexus badge when you could have a Hyundai that is half the price? Ha ha! Unfortunately Nisfiniti will have to go down, too.
LOL. As prices go up quality goes down. Isn't that some economic rule we all learned years ago. No, got that wrong, it was about supply and demand. Did they change the rules when we were not paying attention? Good luck with the cabin cruiser. See you at Union Square. Still ROFLOL.merlinq2 wrote:The best idea yet, keep them until they die!
I bet these cars last as long at a Benz from 30 years ago. We will all live with the tiny issues that we will complain about; but these cars will get us where we need to go over and over again.
It is sad; and nothing we can do about it or is there? Maybe we can run one of those occupy demonstrations and complain how we as luxury car buyers have had enough, we want quality and we want it now!! They seem to be working well to bring the plight of the poor and exploited to the forefront! See you in Union Square at noon!!!
I can only stay and hour: I have to pick the seat fabric for my new cabin cruiser.
I have heard the same thing from several people in the last few years. These cars have changed hands several times over the last several years as all models do. There is no doubt these cars do not age the same as the older models. In the old days they would survive despite the owners best efforts. I see a model split at some point in the forum structure will be required, as the topics of the day will change even more.myother45isalesbaer wrote: I am glad to hear some good posts about Infinities instead of reading about bling, wheel issues and other things I just think are "pimp your ride" matters.
I too have been a huge Nissan fan for the last decade. No car I have owned or driven has felt quite the same as the mid 90s Q or J30 in prime shape. Their best years were 96 (first year of obdII) for the J30 and Q and 99 for the Q45T IMO.merlinq2 wrote:I guess we all have our views, expectations and perceptions of quality. The truth is that all cars are becoming globalized and huge over heads and costs of R&D and the wasted money on engineering is rationalized by CFO's = less content for the same or more money = profit not quality.
Maybe the fact that I have owned Nissan's since 95 and I am very loyal to the brand taints my objectivity, however, I bought my car expecting my needs to be met, reliable, fun to drive, great ride, smooth engine and Nissan Fit and finish, so what I have is a very high end maxima, call me stupid, but I am content in that. Never once has Nissan failed me, my buddy with the 335i went from a G35 cope to the BMW and is now in FX45.
I strongly believe in your opening comment, the old days were better, we needed good cars and that was that. Now we have high school drop outs telling us technology we need. Today's cars are crap their systems suck and the whole idea of value and quality is not sustainable.
!!! +1 one on this! 75k on my 06 and no engine problems (knock on wood). between oil changes, after 3000 miles I'm about 1/2 quart low - if I wait until 5k I'm about a quart low. but I change my oil every 3 to 4 k regardless...expect now, got 5K and need a oil change BADLY -lovemycarM35 wrote:My biggest issue with Infiniti right now is not recalling that seat movment issue I mean really they want you to pay1,200 to repair what I think is a safty issue..and buy the way I had my shortblock replaced under warrenty
my M had I knock at low RPM's running good now but not sure if im sold on the craftman ship if these cars
Very interesting information. I have always liked the FX and living in snow country it makes sense to me. But, having gone to the Infiniti web page that bad boy retails for $61K the way I want it. Thats alot of bucks and my 2004 M45 is priced at dirt for a trade or sale. In my OP the FX is over priced about 15-20K and I still have my doubts about reliability and Infiniti's lousy attitude about customer service. My local dealer does not even have a FX50 on the lot to test drive.SteveTheTech wrote:I have heard the same thing from several people in the last few years. These cars have changed hands several times over the last several years as all models do. There is no doubt these cars do not age the same as the older models. In the old days they would survive despite the owners best efforts. I see a model split at some point in the forum structure will be required, as the topics of the day will change even more.myother45isalesbaer wrote: I am glad to hear some good posts about Infinities instead of reading about bling, wheel issues and other things I just think are "pimp your ride" matters.
I too have been a huge Nissan fan for the last decade. No car I have owned or driven has felt quite the same as the mid 90s Q or J30 in prime shape. Their best years were 96 (first year of obdII) for the J30 and Q and 99 for the Q45T IMO.merlinq2 wrote:I guess we all have our views, expectations and perceptions of quality. The truth is that all cars are becoming globalized and huge over heads and costs of R&D and the wasted money on engineering is rationalized by CFO's = less content for the same or more money = profit not quality.
Maybe the fact that I have owned Nissan's since 95 and I am very loyal to the brand taints my objectivity, however, I bought my car expecting my needs to be met, reliable, fun to drive, great ride, smooth engine and Nissan Fit and finish, so what I have is a very high end maxima, call me stupid, but I am content in that. Never once has Nissan failed me, my buddy with the 335i went from a G35 cope to the BMW and is now in FX45.
I strongly believe in your opening comment, the old days were better, we needed good cars and that was that. Now we have high school drop outs telling us technology we need. Today's cars are crap their systems suck and the whole idea of value and quality is not sustainable.
Look at the progression of the G coupe. Since 2003 that car has improved significantly...but they sold a bunch of those. The Y34 and Q45, the last legit quality Infinitis sold so few they axed the lines. The other models they had between 00 and 04 were...transitional to say the least. Then the QX56 shows up. The FM platform saved the brand. Using it in the FX and G allowed them to save money and improve the product (structurally) year over year. They use quality engine and transmission internal parts, software for those items usually gets more tinkering as the amount of sensors increase. The Jatco transmission has been used in the same basic structure since the early Qs, it now has seven speeds and goes into Neutral when at a stop light.
I hate to run on a little longer on this topic I just see these cars from a different angle than most of you so I have seen some weird things. There were some quality issues in the mid 90s on the other models (QX4 and G20 were never really good vehicles). The reliability and technology have increased over the years although they don't age as well if they are not meticulously upkept.
Alright one more quick thing, the advanced technology in the new models are something that keeps me with Infiniti. These systems are complicated and often misunderstood but they usually work and always build off each other in the next model.The 2012 FX is an amazing vehicle, I highly recommend taking one for a ride if you have the chance. That is a prime example of the continued progression of this brand.
Excellent pointmerlinq2 wrote:Do you recall when Nissan was sold to Renault -1999? I think that was the start of the cost cutting and the quality slump that came a few years after that Renault acquisition. Mind you the Nissan company would have died had it not been for the turn around that was driven by France.
Although I am in not in the market or target demographic for that vehicle I have a different attitude about the FX.myother45isalesbaer wrote: Very interesting information. I have always liked the FX and living in snow country it makes sense to me. But, having gone to the Infiniti web page that bad boy retails for $61K the way I want it. Thats alot of bucks and my 2004 M45 is priced at dirt for a trade or sale. In my OP the FX is over priced about 15-20K and I still have my doubts about reliability and Infiniti's lousy attitude about customer service. My local dealer does not even have a FX50 on the lot to test drive.
