Exhaust - StillenMyM45WillMerkU wrote:I wanna purchase an intake and exhaust but im unsure of which ones would be best any ideas or opinions?
WOW! i didn't know you that you could fit so much BS into a single post about a car you don't even own! and on top of that, squeeze just a few more tablespoons of BS about a topic you know even less about.Q45tech wrote:The best designed intake and loudest exhaust system available will not improve the quarter mile time by even 0.1 seconds as that would require a 10 lb/ft torque increase across the rpm spectrum not just at a single rpm peak.Any extra wheel tire weight will decrease performance more than can be regained. Remember each 100 pounds requires 10 lb/ft to offset.Drivers who exceed 155 pounds are out of spec as far as vehicle design is concerned so are any passengers or trunk items.The difference between empty and 20 gallons of gasoline is 125 pounds resulting in a 0.125 second difference in acceleration.A full tank and a date is a disadvantage in acceleration.
No, he's right. it is impossible to increase the performance of any car by 10ft/lbs throughout the entire rpm range.fiveliterbeater wrote:
WOW! i didn't know you that you could talk so much BS into a single post about a car you don't even own! and on top of that, squeeze just a few more tablespoons of BS about a topic you know even less about.
congratulations!
p.s. you are aware that professional wrestling is fake right?
fiveliterbeater wrote:
WOW! i didn't know you that you could fit so much BS into a single post about a car you don't even own! and on top of that, squeeze just a few more tablespoons of BS about a topic you know even less about.
congratulations!
p.s. you are aware that professional wrestling is fixed right?
Modified by fiveliterbeater at 11:07 AM 4/29/2009
Dennis (Q45tech) has done more research and real automotive engineering on cars in his life than most members who regularly post here ... combined. Please do a search on his posts - particularly in the Engineering forum - and you will understand why what he says is often more accurate than anything you are likely to see with seat of the pants work.fiveliterbeater wrote:WOW! i didn't know you that you could fit so much BS into a single post about a car you don't even own! and on top of that, squeeze just a few more tablespoons of BS about a topic you know even less about.
congratulations!
p.s. you are aware that professional wrestling is fixed right?
Huh, he comes out here and says that increasing power and performance is impossible and does not provide any real proof and you don't consider that flaming? again, another example of having "tech" in your screen name and you are considered to know everything.szhosain wrote:
Dennis (Q45tech) has done more research and real automotive engineering on cars in his life than most members who regularly post here ... combined. Please do a search on his posts - particularly in the Engineering forum - and you will understand why what he says is often more accurate than anything you are likely to see with seat of the pants work.
Flame reactions are simply not necessary.
Z
I meant PERSONAL flame attacks. I.e., that have nothing to with the topic - there is a difference. Getting heated about the topic is generally not a problem.ken in az wrote:I have said it before but the mods here don't respect it - if you post that non performance related BS in a performance related thread - YOU will get flamed! simple as that. We have the same FLAME rights as they do.
(szhosain) , i apologize for the personal attacks but here is the reason my "insults" and please see it from my point of view:szhosain wrote:
Dennis (Q45tech) has done more research and real automotive engineering on cars in his life than most members who regularly post here ... combined. Flame reactions are simply not necessary.Z
..........exactly the opposite capt obvious; its because I've spent a lot of time and money that makes my facts more believeable than someone just sitting at a computer spouting out nonsense. as to if I'm a sucker or not, I guess it depends on how you view it; I'm not proud of all the money dumped on cars but it was fun and I'm more responsible with my money now.GJEMD wrote:Just because you spent a lot of time and money does not make your view fact based. What did you actually get for your effort? The only thing thats clear is the possibility that you've been a sucker and don't realize it.
Again, Exhaust note makes NOT performance. My M45 is so quiet that if the radio is on you must watch the tach if driven aggressively. I prefer the Hans Solo HYPERSPACE version of acceleration. You know hit it and whala you're further down the road and its not apparent how you got there. STOCK RULESchimor2001 wrote:I got magna flow catbacks and I'm totally digging it. It's not to aggressive sounding until you floor it. Performance gains are good as well.
I'm assuming your on the older side of the spectrum. Some of us younger to middle aged folks enjoy the exhaust note of a healthy V8 under the hood. Now if it's the V6 your sporting under the hood, then I would definitely keep the exhaust notes as quiet as possible.The only reason my M45 has exhaust on it was because surprisingly she wanted a little sound from it. The sound my exhaust system emits is quite tame really. It really sounds like an FX or G35 sport coupe, but with a little deeper tone to the exhaust sound.You cannot really hear it at cruising speeds or under light acceleration.It's all personal preference really.GJEMD wrote:
Again, Exhaust note makes NOT performance. My M45 is so quiet that if the radio is on you must watch the tach if driven aggressively. I prefer the Hans Solo HYPERSPACE version of acceleration. You know hit it and whala you're further down the road and its not apparent how you got there. STOCK RULES