Post by
rico05 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/rico05-u8176.html
Wed Mar 12, 2008 4:51 am
What's more, I only run Shell V-Power 93 octane. If you map it for E85, that is the way to go. But until I see more of it around, I am not going to fuss with a new ECU and plumbing.
Cars with adaptive ECUs like SRT-4s or Subarus can get away with 89, but they pull timing and boost to do it. So if you really want, you could buy a programmable ECU of some flavor and map it for lower octane gas, but the trade off will be you will be 10-20% lower power and torque when compared to someone running the same modifications on 93 octane.
Also keep in mind that in Japan, where the original mapping for the ECU was done, they can get much higher octane gas than we can (before anyone jumps me for saying that, I realize their ratings are different than our RON+MON/2 solution), and that the car was designed before the current oil crunch. The CA does have a rich factory map, but I would be installing a knock amp or some sort of knock monitor and keep out of boost for more than 10-15 seconds.
Bascally the answer is yes, she can "run" it. But she would be better off with a I/H/E + cams KA24DE with a 50 squeeze of juice if she has to run the cheap stuff. Owning a turbo toy is not cheap, and looking at it from a "how can I skimp on this" angle will yield a melted pile of parts that used to be a motor.