http://www.9news.com/news/article/27106 ... is-picture

First I
Then I
Good night, NICO.

With a lit cigarette in its mouth.themadscientist wrote:The baby should be holding the gas can.
themadscientist wrote:The baby should be holding the gas can.
frapjap wrote:With a lit cigarette in its mouth.themadscientist wrote:The baby should be holding the gas can.
themadscientist wrote:Clove cigarette too.
WIN!!!Dattebayo wrote:No, you all have it wrong. You fill the tank up with baby, and sing the gasoline to sleep.
DeShazer says the officer continued to question her about the child in the back seat, the child in the photo, not in any restraints. He says her response to the officer was, "Oh, he unbuckles and buckles his seatbelt by himself all the time."
DeShazer says the officer's response to that was, "And then buckles in the gas canister?"
According to DeShazer, the woman didn't have a response to the officer's question.

Damn straight. I didn't ride on any bullpucky booster seat until I was eleventytwelve years old and last I checked I did not become dead or seriously injured at any point while riding in a car.themadscientist wrote:Kids are too soft.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6wOt2iXdc4[/youtube]
While normally I agree with the both of you (either we think alike or I'm easily influenced), I'm going to have to take the other side here.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Damn straight. I didn't ride on any bullpucky booster seat until I was eleventytwelve years old and last I checked I did not become dead or seriously injured at any point while riding in a car.themadscientist wrote:Kids are too soft.
ThirdPedalGirl, your friendly neighborhood Pinterest filter wrote:When my dad raced hobby stock, there were no SAFER barriers or HANS devices. He never broke his neck or punched his steering column through his chest by hitting a wall.
Racecar drivers are a bunch of p****** these days.
Your reasoning is flawed. Before you call modern parents p****** for using current safety tech in their cars for their kids, you should look at pictures of what a four year old looks like after she's been thrown through a windshield and clear of a car in a high speed crash.
You have a good point. The crashes are out of the child's control, and thus this isn't an issue of darwinism on their part. No reason a poor kid should have to suffer because of the ineptitude of a (potentially unrelated) adult driver.AppleBonker wrote:While normally I agree with the both of you (either we think alike or I'm easily influenced), I'm going to have to take the other side here.
MoD, the people that did end up dead that could've been saved by a car seat probably aren't as vocal with their opinion today...