Just keep in mind that many of us here have years of experience owning Infiniti and Nissan cars of some sort (21+ years in my case), and the actual results with a number of people posting here over the years, has been quite negative on K&N oiled filters. In most cases, cleaning/replacing the MAF and going back to OEM (non-oiled) filters has been the cure for engine drivability issues.alexzf6 wrote:It is impossible for oil to come off and interfere with your MAF. The amount of oil onit is very small (usually less than 2 ounces). Once the oil is properly and evenly absorbed through the cotton, no oil will come off, even under extreme driving conditions. It is ridiculous, because no dealership or service provider has ever been able to provide any evidence to support this "myth". I guess its just the "anti-aftermarket" crowd that keeps throwing that out there.
It is entirely possible and does indeed occur, even on just excessively dirty OEM filters. It is just dumber than dumb to install an oiled filter in front of a hot wire MAF sensor, or not to change the stock filter annually. Also, the OEM filter will filter better than a K&N and better than 99% of aftermarket filters. Pressure drop across the filter only costs you less than 3 HP vs. no filter, virtually unnoticeable.alexzf6 wrote:It is impossible for oil to come off and interfere with your MAF.
The originator of this thread asked about the best filter for an '06 M35x. Interestingly K & N does not list an air filter for this model. The issue of a K & N oil impregnated air filter for his M is a moot point...rsg123 wrote:Check out this page on K&N's website. http://www.knfilters.com/MAF/massair.htmWe have used K&N filters on several of our cars. One has been running with one for 150,000 miles and not one MAF issue.
Well since the issue of K&N air filters ruining MAF sensors came up, I decided to do a search and present what I found. Sounds like there are a lot of uninformed people out there.antzrus wrote:
The originator of this thread asked about the best filter for an '06 M35x. Interestingly K & N does not list an air filter for this model. The issue of a K & N oil impregnated air filter for his M is a moot point...
Yes there are. Basically, there are owners who understand some physics and material processes, then there are those who have to rely on advertising.rsg123 wrote:
Well since the issue of K&N air filters ruining MAF sensors came up, I decided to do a search and present what I found. Sounds like there are a lot of uninformed people out there.
Did you actually go to the website I cited? I assume that you didn't, so I will give you a summary. K&N received lots of bad MAF sensors that dealerships or repair shops blamed on K&N filters. They found that out of 87 bad sensors, only one had a trace oil contamination. The contamination was so small that they could not determine if it was oil from the filter or from elsewhere. Unless K&N is faking the data, which would be a huge scandal, I will continue to be comfortable putting K&N filters in all of my cars. Sorry OP, but maybe they will start making filters for your car soon.maxnix wrote:Yes there are. Basically, there are owners who understand some physics and material processes, then there are those who have to rely on advertising.
A K&N won't hurt a carbureted car, except for the larger particle contaminants.
ok szhosain, i hate to be the bearer of bad news but i'm going to side with alexzf6 on this one and your argument is valid but without any proof whatsoever.......szhosain wrote: Z
.........as there always is. if there is one "myth" that people are really gullible and like to think that is true is the famous "K&N filter debacle". the reason this myth stands is because over the years, you will have a few oddball warranty cases where you hear about a dealership that voids a warranty due to blaming a poor innocent soul that decided to add a K&N filter to his car to be cool when the "check engine" light comes on.that poor guy then goes online and starts ranting and telling the world about how bad K&N is and how he will never ever use aftermarket filters and blah blah blah........and on top of all that, you have SHEEP on every website that like to gossip and spout out claims such as "i heard from this guy that his engine had problems and was denied warranty work" and you get the rest......rsg123 wrote:
Well since the issue of K&N air filters ruining MAF sensors came up, I decided to do a search and present what I found. Sounds like there are a lot of uninformed people out there.
.........that is very true and one point i forgot to include in some of my other posts. some people go overboard with the filter-charger kit and...well....you pretty much covered the rest and blah blah blah...........alexzf6 wrote:Ive been running an Injen cold air intake with an OILED filter for about 4000 mi. now. I took it apart yesterday to adjust the filter and guess what.....The inside of the pipe was COMPLETELY dry. I think the people who are having MAF issues are soaking their filters with so much oil that some just has to come off.
.....wish i could side with you, but i've had the opposite side of the coin results, when adding a K&N filter to my LS1, 5.0, 240sx, maxima etc. etc. never encountered a single problem to my MAF on any of my old cars but what can i say, i guess i got lucky.performance wise though, i have to say that i've never noticed a difference between stock vs. aftermarket filters.ken in az wrote:I've had trouble with K&N brand new out of the box filters killing the MAF on my silverado.
Ultimately, this is what makes me feel that the effort to do the oiled filter is simply not worth it.fiveliterbeater wrote:performance wise though, i have to say that i've never noticed a difference between stock vs. aftermarket filters.
I agree that I have no personal experience with it. That is true ... luckily!fiveliterbeater wrote:ok szhosain, i hate to be the bearer of bad news but i'm going to side with alexzf6 on this one and your argument is valid but without any proof whatsoever.......
Nope, I am not a Nissan tech.fiveliterbeater wrote:Just keep in mind that many of us here have years of experience owning Infiniti and Nissan cars of some sort (21+ years in my case) .....this statement doesn't really tell us much because manufacturers are constantly updating and improving engine driveability, so unless you are a certified "Nissan tech" who is paid to be trained and certified to work on new vehicles, you know as much as any Infiniti/Nissan owner who has owned that brand for 21+years (unless you are a tech then i stand corrected)
The difference is that people here at NICO over the years have done this "mod" and we have heard their reports on the problems that they caused.fiveliterbeater wrote:the actual results with a number of people posting here over the years, has been quite negative on K&N oiled filters. i would actually extend that statement and say that pretty much any mod whatsoever has been quite negative over the past few months, so no new discoveries here
I am not the kind of person who jumps up and down and yells a lot (well, certainly not often ). So while it may come across like I am not being emphatic here, I would MOST certainly not use the K&N filter on my Indiniti and MOST certainly never buy a used car on which they had been used, and MOST certainly never recommend them.fiveliterbeater wrote:In most cases, cleaning/replacing the MAF and going back to OEM (non-oiled) filters has been the cure for engine drivability issues. ...i don't know what to say to this one, never heard of a FILTER causing engine driveability unless the filter is CLOGGED. i mean, c'mon.....do you really believe that yourself? you dont sound very convinced yourself when making that statement......but ok
convinced!szhosain wrote:Hope that convinces you that I am convinced about the topic. Z