What about a 2jz??

The Nissan 300ZX (Z32) general community discussion forum
User avatar
TLVespasian
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:14 am

Post

No Im not plannin on doin this but has anyone swapped a 2 or 1jzgtte into a z32?? I think that coud be a viable alternative to the ever contriversial rb26 swapp. Yeah it would be a bastard but I think it would be flippin hott!!


User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

toy power is soo wrong but I knows it's been done in early Z's, saw a car run a low 10 second 1/4 mile pass on street tires! the benefit is they cost half what an RB costs, but in a Z32 it's easier to get the same power form the stock TT engine

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

I've seen it done. But why not stick with the VG30DETT?

User avatar
TLVespasian
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:14 am

Post

caus it would be easier to work on in the long run....yeah, yeah I know by time you spend the money on mounts and such you coulda built up the VG but.....

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

IMO Nissan engines belong in Nissan's just like Chevy engines belong in Chevy's and honda motors in honda's and so on.

Spending tons of money to be different and have a 2jz in a Z32 when you could be just as fast for less doesn't make sense to me.

User avatar
Hybridpunk420
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:50 am
Car: 1993 nissan 300zx NA
Contact:

Post

i also want to do an engine swap down the line (especially since i got a VG30de) but most resources say just to stick with the vg30deTT since you know you'll have no problems and have the option of a warranty... they also say that it is reliably capable of 900+ HP... dunno if its true but i've seen some gnarly things done to those motors.

NSR_s30
Posts: 15113
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 5:10 pm
Car: '99 Ford F250 7.3L Diesel
'71 Datsun 240Z
Contact:

Post

I've seen SR20s in Z32's....but why?
TLVespasian wrote:caus it would be easier to work on in the long run....yeah, yeah I know by time you spend the money on mounts and such you coulda built up the VG but.....
Easier to work on? If you don't want to work on it take it to the dealer...

ph
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed May 09, 2007 4:29 pm

Post

NSR_S13 wrote:I've seen SR20s......
Bang for the buck, 2JZ is a great swap. Forget all about brand loyalty.....

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

the 2JZ is a real bargin, but makes a better swap into an S30

300zx_tt
Posts: 66
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 4:47 pm
Car: 300zx twin turbo

Post

why not jsut drop in a porsche 911 turbo in there, you ownt have anythign else to worry about

User avatar
tg
Posts: 3090
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:15 am

Post

ghey.

User avatar
FoxFire
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:58 pm
Car: 90 vg30eT 240SX, s12 vg30e
Contact:

Post

go chevy 400 sbc and throw that in it with a twin turbo setup w/ a sfmc

stroke it to a 383 after punching the 400 to a 408 w/ 6" forged con rods

rev king v8

but if it was mine then i would single turbo gt45r turbo

youll never need more then 400hp for anything driving on the street

anymore then 400whp youll be spinning in 3rd and spinning into trees

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

^ lol

The advice some people give amuses me

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

^^ Post of the week!

Wheres my calculator???

User avatar
FoxFire
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:58 pm
Car: 90 vg30eT 240SX, s12 vg30e
Contact:

Post

you like that one eh ^

i co own a 91 rx7 with a 408 sbc @6 psi b & m blower

that why i recommend it

6 in rods in it will put it at a 383 but not a 350, 383but a 9k rev limit v8 383

in a 4600lb car it ran a 11.78 w/ the a/c on with 9 inch street tires @ 6psi0-60 mph in 3.5 flat

bring it on ill smash a 911 turbo with a pair of slicks

Modified by FoxFire at 9:13 PM 5/30/2007
Modified by FoxFire at 9:16 PM 5/30/2007

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

I think the point is that your suggestion to stroke a 400 sbc to 383, is uh impossible, if you increase the stroke your increase the displacement therefore you'd have more than the 383 cubes, the typical 383 stroker uses the longer 400sbc crank in a clearnaced 350 sbc block with whatever overbore to bring the total displacament to 383, longer rods do not change your displacement, they only change your rod stroke angle, and require you to use different piston to accomidate the changed pin height, and you can bore a 400 to 408, or you can stroke it to whatever, but it can't displace 4.8 and 383, it's one or the other

no offence but there are plenty of non power adder small block heavy iron cars trunning 11's or better on 9" DOT's

the 383 is s proven power combo and can reach well in excess of 400 hp without any form of power adder, your statement about not needing more than 400hp is off mark as well, in theory anything more than 50 or so to get your car up to interstate speeds is not needed on the street, my 2105 lb car has about 400hp at the crank right now, and the new bottom end should get me to 400 at the wheel, and well over 500 at the crank...in a 2100 lb car! also the new Z06 comes with 505 hp from the factory, tha C5 Z06 came with 405, I'm sure a few at the hand of inexperienced drivers found their way into trees but the majority are still safely driving on the roads, even with their dangerous 405 hp!

now you want to talk rev king V8, there si a guy in PA, andy Nelson, he built a 383, and stuck it in a 260Z, with custom timed headers merging into a single 4" exhaust, that thing reved and sounded like no other american V8 I;'ve ever heard, it ran low 10's int he quarter, no pwer adders needed, and it was pretty heavy for an S30, I think he said it weighed about 2850!

User avatar
FoxFire
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 6:58 pm
Car: 90 vg30eT 240SX, s12 vg30e
Contact:

Post

im buying a whole balenced crank, rod, and piston setup

the rod to stroke ratio is better acc

its a 6 inch rod with the same 2 bolt main setup but forged and low compression pistons 8-1

the kit puts it at a 383 displacment at they claim 10k without throwing bearings

k add .5 inch less stroke to each cylinder plus 6mm? lower pin hieght i havent done the math personally

so im not saying your wrong ill do the math when im not faded

what kind of car do you have that wieghs 2100lbs

vette's has traction control

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

hehe"add .5 less"

how do you add a negative

then you'd be "de-stroking" the 400 not "stroking" it?

and yeah .5" (about 1.25mm) less stroke + 6mm longer rod = about 4.75 higher pin height

and my 2105 lb car is a 71 240Z was an L28ET, and no interior, the early cars only weighed about 2150 lbs fully dressed, but the engine swap adds some weight, actually I've changed some stuff and not sure of the car weighs more or less than last weigh in, heavier wheels and tires, lighter suspension parts, little trimming to fit the 315/35 17's, added a urethane airdam to replace the metal valance

Booztd 3
Posts: 708
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:28 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Contact:

Post

FoxFire wrote:youll never need more then 400hp for anything driving on the street

anymore then 400whp youll be spinning in 3rd and spinning into trees
Hahaha, so thats why I never see any supras out........please....400hp on the street and I feel like I was driving my old accord around. With a good set of tires, you could use 600-700hp on the street w/out spin

Booztd 3
Posts: 708
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 8:28 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Contact:

Post

FoxFire wrote:in a 4600lb car it ran a 11.78 w/ the a/c on with 9 inch street tires @ 6psi0-60 mph in 3.5 flat
Thats real safe, wet down the track with AC condensation

User avatar
bone_stock_240
Posts: 3467
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 4:50 am
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45

Post

evildky wrote:hehe"add .5 less"

how do you add a negative
4 + (-3) = 1

seems easy enough to me.


Return to “300ZX (Z32) General”