I dunno - the Altimas are tuned to run on 87 octane, so gas grade really shouldn't be a factor (unless the OP got a bad tank or something). Worn down tires can actually provide better dry traction (but worse wet traction) because the water channels are gone and you have more rubber on the road. That would depend on how the tire is constructed of course.Mr.Coupe wrote:Did you change Gas Grade in the last couple tests? That could be one of the reasons. Tires could be going low on thread. Those are the only things I can think of. Well good luck finding the solution dude.
Ricky C.
Nah, I get what you're saying bud. I'm just trying to say don't get all bent out of shape because you're times might be a second or two off from using a device that wasn't designed with car performance in mind. There's a lot of factors that could be influencing how the iTouch reads...I mean, you could have it at a small angle off that could be throwing the readings...crayzitalian3 wrote:
marlin you are right about the dynolicious thing, im not saying your wrong, but if you know G-tech is and when they compared them both (G-tech Pro and the Dynolicious App) the Dynolicious app was more accurate to the time slip then the G-tech was, which was impressing.
im going to do some more runs probably in a couple days to a week to see if there were any changes
I agree with the humid part. I lived in Deer Park. Your in the middle of the island with no breeze. It gets really humid there. All i can say is thank god i had a basment apartment during the summer...marlin29311 wrote:
Nah, I get what you're saying bud. I'm just trying to say don't get all bent out of shape because you're times might be a second or two off from using a device that wasn't designed with car performance in mind. There's a lot of factors that could be influencing how the iTouch reads...I mean, you could have it at a small angle off that could be throwing the readings...
I'd say wait until it gets a little cooler/less humid out at see what happens with the fuel tune. And the balding tires don't ever help either...
(for the most part)JeremyMicheal wrote:i'd say eventhough our egine is designed for 87 octane i dont think droping back to regular tune on the on BD is gonna give us more performance. this is just my observation as i dont own a BD yet but will shortly and plan on running the prem..tune. I've always ran 93 in all my cars.
def thismaxentropy wrote:I guarentee its the outside temperature since it's getting hotter and hotter still.
^yupmaxentropy wrote:danny runs the premium tune on his BD if I remember correctly-- but he also has the headers and runs premium fuel.
like they said....you're going off an application that's supposed to be a ball park figure....not dead on accurate.and besides,,,,may i ask why you're beating up on your poor little nissan? maybe she's trying to tell you that she's tired of you flooring it and she wants you to be gentle nowcrayzitalian3 wrote:once in a while maybe like once or twice a month i would go to this vacant lot by my house and do some 0-60 runs with my dynolicious app for my itouch. i usually get like mid to high 7's sometimes low low 8's.
Let's not confuse octane with fuel cleanliness. The two are WAY different.JeremyMicheal wrote:sorry to hijack your thread crazy..
eventhough everyone says the car is designed for 87 i do get alittle better performance. i commute 90 miles a day and noticed i get 3 miles more per gallon. i know it's not alot more, but in my mind getting better gas mileage and using a cleaner fuel is worth it..plus there's always the butt dyno..