went to the track and it sucked!

For the RWD SR20DET cars! Sponsored by Wiring Specialties.
Justicc86
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 6:26 pm
Car: anything to do with cars

Post

yester day I went to the local drag strip and ran my car for the first time with the fmic, safc2, boost controller (14psi) and my car ran the same as it did on stock boost and smic that time is : 14.62@ 98mph wtf ?

also I have not changed any settings on the safc2 Is this the problem?

any help will be great!


User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

the fuel map should be fine for a setting of 14. what about tires? crappy tires won't grip well and give crappy times

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

no LSD, worn tires and improper fuel tuning would be my guesses.

I bet it mostly has to do with you SAFC though, you might be running really rich.

PacManVR4
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:34 pm

Post

Decent trap, drive a little better. What did you run before?

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

I dont know anything about AFC's other than i dont like them.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

^ :Werd

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

What was your 60ft? that trap speed says you should have gone faster. You were granny shifting weren't you ;)

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

he forgot to double clutch it :lol:

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

I was wondering if anyone would catch that reference :D

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

i've been quoting that movie way too much tonight. i need to lay off the starburst

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

Cyberkreig wrote:I dont know anything about AFC's other than i dont like them.


and that sir makes you a moron.

PacManVR4
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:34 pm

Post

I would hate to have a hard tuned ECU. Fuel computers and standalones are gods gift to tuning. F the one size fits all stuff. If you hate an AFC, you dont know anything about them.

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

SRdave240 wrote:and that sir makes you a moron.


I'm not going to resort to personal insults, I'm not a troll.

SAFC's are BAD news. It is a band-aid cure, for a serious problem. Tuning of fuel and igniton should not be guess-work. I despise people that claim 30++hp from plugging one of these into their stock car. And i dont have any love for people that try to tune modified motors with something like this and complain about rich/lean conditions. GET a wide band (or dyno time) and something with a 16x16 map. Like emanage or standalone if you have the money.

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

Sorry if I was a little harsh. but like you said yourself - you don';t know anything about them!! Sure, you won't get 30whp out of a stock car just by plugging one in. But it is a great inexpensive tool that lets me correct my A/F's run larger injectors and run a z32 MAF. At the same time, it provides a super accurate tach, a knock sensor read out, a MAF sensor voltage read out, and looks really pretty sitting on my dash (LOL). Am I claiming it is as good a tuning tool as a stand alone? Hell No! I will get a Power FC eventually. But it is not a band aid cure.

You need to educate yourself before you go bashing products.

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

Then i'm sorry but we are going to have to disagree. I DO feel that it is a bandaid cure. It does do all the things you just listed but it doesnt accurately tune the fuel curve. It does, in my experience, give the owner a sense of security. I have yet to meet anyone with a moderately modified motor (upgraded injectors/turbo) tuned by SAFC that was running correctly (not rich/lean)

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

OK, we can disagree. Maybe your friends just don't know how to use it correctly (although it's not that difficult).

Would it make you feel better if I posted my A/F ratios before and after tuning with my S-AFC II? Granted I don't have a turbo upgrade or larger injectors but I fixed a WAY lean condition - went from about 18:1 down to 12.5:1.

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

Actualy its pretty likely that the people i've met dont know how to use it. LoL. Maybe thats part of my soured outlook.

I'm not saying it doesnt have A use, I just dont think it should be relied on solely. With A/F ratios like that it sounds like you had some sort of wideband tuning. (the right thing to do vs. Autometer bouncy-light)

ItzGenX
Posts: 1204
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:46 pm
Car: Smoke Purple 95' S14.5. Powered by the "Iron Man".
Location: Gulfport, MS
Contact:

Post

LOL! Thread highjackers! :confused:

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

yeah just a bit.. but he did ask about his SAFC settings =P

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

Yeah, I used the WBO2 - not much point in dyno"tuning" without one. On the stret, I keep things in check with a Greddy EGT - narrowband A/F gauges are pretty worthless IMO.

I will agree with you on the point that if you are going for a turbo upgrade with 300+whp, just a fuel controller is not the best option.

Tweaky_Tom
Posts: 552
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 7:12 am

Post

What he said!

User avatar
ride4lame
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2002 6:00 pm
Contact:

Post

uh back to the original topic, what was the 60' time?

GTS4-R
Posts: 765
Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 5:59 pm
Car: my feet
Contact:

Post

SRdave240 wrote:Sorry if I was a little harsh. but like you said yourself - you don';t know anything about them!! Sure, you won't get 30whp out of a stock car just by plugging one in. But it is a great inexpensive tool that lets me correct my A/F's run larger injectors and run a z32 MAF. At the same time, it provides a super accurate tach, a knock sensor read out, a MAF sensor voltage read out, and looks really pretty sitting on my dash (LOL). Am I claiming it is as good a tuning tool as a stand alone? Hell No! I will get a Power FC eventually. But it is not a band aid cure.

You need to educate yourself before you go bashing products.
Knock sensor read-out? are we sure about this one....as far as I know the only FMU units that can be used to read knock would be the Stand-alone units.....I've NEVER heard of a piggy-back reading knock......

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

The new S-AFCII's do have a knock readout.

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

Yes, it is basically a numerical display of your factory knock sensor reading.

It is nice to know it's there. It actually came in handy in letting me know not to use 91 octane. The knock was inaudible to me but I caught it with the readout.

Justicc86
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 6:26 pm
Car: anything to do with cars

Post

Well for the folks using a safc2, what is a good base setting to start from. Do I need to start leaning it out or add fuel?

and the 60ft is 2.2 on street tires not my best but I figured it is good enough. and the times im running the same times that I did when I was running stock boost and the side mount intercooler.

stumpz
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2003 1:44 pm

Post

hrmm, sounds interesting, i am not yet sure, i recently installed my afc2, but i'm not very familiar w/ all of it's features as of right now. i've ran into some other complications. so..

Cyberkreig
Posts: 3048
Joined: Sun Sep 01, 2002 4:40 pm
Car: 1993 Nissan 240SX SR
Contact:

Post

Justicc86 wrote:Well for the folks using a safc2, what is a good base setting to start from. Do I need to start leaning it out or add fuel?


See SRdave, THIS is what I was trying to say!

Justicc -- So you saying that you installed FMIC, SAFC and raised boost and you are still running the same times as before? You are also saying that you just plugged in the SAFC and didnt tune it in anyway? Without at least an EGT gage I'd venture a guess that the AFC isnt doing you any good!! This is not guess work, and each motor is different no one can just GIVE you a base setting.

Here is my best advice to you: 1.) Rich means slow & cold, Lean means Fast & Hot. You probably need to lean the car out but without the help of widebando2 or EGT you run the serious risk of damaging or destroying your motor. I would like to see what the car runs with the SAFC unplugged.

ItzGenX
Posts: 1204
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:46 pm
Car: Smoke Purple 95' S14.5. Powered by the "Iron Man".
Location: Gulfport, MS
Contact:

Post

Justic, I just noticed you are from Hattis. :D

Anyway, my motor did 14.1@98 at stock boost. Where are your shift points? When I upped the boost to 12.5psi it ran 13.8@101. This is with no AFC or anything just a boost controller. This is with 93 octane and nasty richness (cool fireballs when I go down the track sometimes).


Return to “SR20DET Forum (rear-drive)”