boost_boy wrote:Those cams aren't that eccentric and your losses are definitely not just the cams. The bigger cam on the exhaust side will hurt you down low, but it shouldn't be that significant on the top end. I can't tell you to go back and try it again because you say you live 45mins away from the dyno and that's just not going to be efficient for you. Let me ask you this, when you installed the cams, did you reset your computer or just left the batter hooked-up? When you did the last dyno run, was the ecu chipped with that chip or stock? The plugs can also be a factor, but we'll cross that path later. Unfortunately, it sounds like you're going to need some tuning, but I'll wait for your answers to the questions I asked.
Dee
r32line wrote:Yeah like boost boy pointed out, reset your ecu after you change things like that, that way the ECU can accomodate the changes quicker. Id say a tune may be the best way to take full advantage of the mods.
Did you check and re-check cam timing, then ignition timing, then ignition timing under load? The reason I ask this is, not saying it's true, but possibly the cam timing is off and possibly causing high egts or timing is too advance and causing the engine to detonate which causes the knock sensor to pull back timing to safe level. I'm just throwing a few things out there because it's not the cams that are causing your power loss. Dude, I would check and double check everything possible before you start making conclusions. I'm pretty sure you'll be able to safely figure this stuff out.JDMSIL80 wrote:I don't mind doing a full tune to make the most of the mods. But first I wanted to figure the problem first because putting in more money.
Modified by JDMSIL80 at 5:03 PM 7/25/2006boost_boy wrote:Did you check and re-check cam timing, then ignition timing, then ignition timing under load? The reason I ask this is, not saying it's true, but possibly the cam timing is off and possibly causing high egts or timing is too advance and causing the engine to detonate which causes the knock sensor to pull back timing to safe level. I'm just throwing a few things out there because it's not the cams that are causing your power loss. Dude, I would check and double check everything possible before you start making conclusions. I'm pretty sure you'll be able to safely figure this stuff out.
Dee
Everyone is entitled to their opinions on the matter, but the bottom line is that you're not happy with your last dyno outting and you need answers. Your camshaft set-up in my honest opinion is not too aggressive at all for your turbo configurations. I would even consider the ecu's chip. I'm pretty sure Horsham is established at doing what they do, but maybe that chip is preventing the ecu from fully responding to your upgrades. It so many variables to consider that it's not even funny or can be something as simple as increasing the fuel pressure.JDMSIL80 wrote:I don't believe the cams would make me lose power either.
However, people from SXOC & Freshalloy who responded to my problem are saying the my camshafts are way too aggressive for my GT28R. Which my turbo will run out of breathe long before the camshafts make power. They said I should change back to stock or keep 256's for the turbo size. Do you agree on this statement?
All i know is that my timing is set at 15* BTDC when my mechanic put in the camshafts. What should the cam timing and ignition timing be with these camshafts? Please advise.
Modified by JDMSIL80 at 5:03 PM 7/25/2006
boost_boy wrote:Everyone is entitled to their opinions on the matter, but the bottom line is that you're not happy with your last dyno outting and you need answers. Your camshaft set-up in my honest opinion is not too aggressive at all for your turbo configurations. I would even consider the ecu's chip. I'm pretty sure Horsham is established at doing what they do, but maybe that chip is preventing the ecu from fully responding to your upgrades. It so many variables to consider that it's not even funny or can be something as simple as increasing the fuel pressure.
I'm like you, I'm firing in the dark at this issue, but the camshaft set-up you have is the exact same one I'm using. And though I haven't gone to the dyno yet, I have a little more flexibility with the standalone I'm using. Baseline timing should be at 15* BTDC. I don't know where the Horsham chip puts your timing, but if this the same ecu you've used in the past, it could be a matter of getting some kind of piggy back for some additional tuning because adding camshafts will require you to do some tuning.
Dee
That's crazy! The biggest thing I see is that you don't have the ability to manipulate your ecu to accomodate such camshafts. I say again, those camshafts aren't that crazy. I have a set of camshafts in my garage (276* w/11.5mm lift and 268* with an 11.35mm lift) that I consider to be wicked. If you feel the camshafts are hurting you and you don't want to change your electronics, put your stockers back in and call it a day. With upgrades comes extra modification and that's the only way you're going to advance your power significantly. If you liked your performance before, put it back to the way it was and take it back to the dyno to see if things are back to normal.JDMSIL80 wrote:I'm thinking if I should replace the exhaust camshaft with 264 instead and have less overlap. From what I heard so far, ppl are saying the 272 is way too aggressive for the turbo.
boost_boy wrote:That's crazy! The biggest thing I see is that you don't have the ability to manipulate your ecu to accomodate such camshafts. I say again, those camshafts aren't that crazy. I have a set of camshafts in my garage (276* w/11.5mm lift and 268* with an 11.35mm lift) that I consider to be wicked. If you feel the camshafts are hurting you and you don't want to change your electronics, put your stockers back in and call it a day. With upgrades comes extra modification and that's the only way you're going to advance your power significantly. If you liked your performance before, put it back to the way it was and take it back to the dyno to see if things are back to normal.
Dee
Modified by JDMSIL80 at 3:13 PM 7/28/2006boost_boy wrote:I run a T3/T04E 60-1, but with a few tricks to make it a frankenstein candidate. For the record, my back housing is a .48..........
Dee
OmarM wrote:And looking at your dyno sheets you made 271 peak with the new cams at 5816rpms. looks like your running pretty rich up top. I would try to lean out to about 11.8 to 12.1 a/fs might help power.
Realistically JDM, what kind of power are you looking for? You can get over 300whp with the stock engine, period. The 264s on both sides are excellent too as I once ran this set-up and got excellent performance out of them. Good idle, good power and overall good on power throughout the rpm band. Changing them around would be your choice, especially if the stock ones gave you what you wanted.JDMSIL80 wrote:Do you guys think a 264 exhaust camshaft would be compatible with my setup? Or just settle with stock exhaust camshaft?
I have both camshaft sitting around, just thinking which one to put in. Either way I have pay labour to install.
Thanks!
Must be the car's shadow because there is not enough room left to hang anything from the intercooler.tyrannix wrote:Dee, whats that hanging off your IC? or is that an illusion of somethign on the ground?
CJ