Post by
turbo300 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/turbo300-u7216.html
Wed Feb 04, 2004 8:26 pm
All things being equal, a skilled TIG operator will produce better quality welds on most materials than an ARC operator can.The fact that the gas flow and voltage are fully controllable "on the fly"by the operator place TIG in a class above the other methods. There will be less crystalization of the base material, no slag inclusions, and and much less heat tranferred to unwanted areas because of the preciseness of the tungsten electrode. While with ARC the vaporized slag that gives it its "sheilding effect" is smoky and cloudy, the TIG shielding gas is transparent letting the operator see the weld puddle or the keyhole clearly. With the TIG, having the operator controll the feeding of the filler rod gives much more controll over where and how much material is added to the weld, while the ARC deposits weld material constantly. When using stainless , there is no competition...TIG will always be superior to ARC (SMAW). Besides penetration, (which isnt a problem here because both can easily penetrate 3/8 -1/2) about the only advantage that ARC has is versatility: ease of changing rods for various metals and that it can me more easily used "in the field" (no gas driftng, lighter and more portable). These manifolds most likely will be fabbed inside in a controlled environment nullifying that advantage).
sorry for the long post,mark