weight distribution

For the RWD SR20DET cars! Sponsored by Wiring Specialties.
14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

Any body wheigh their 240 after swap? Rb guy says his is 46/56 in a s13, but I was wondering what the dist. would be after ca/sr swap.


silver240
Posts: 33
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 1:57 pm
Car: 1990 240sx coupe with s13 reedtop sr20det

Post

i dont know but it cant change to much maybe + or - 3%. how much does the sr weigh.

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

what you talking bout mane

User avatar
quiksilvia
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 7:09 am
Car: 95 s14 se
Contact:

Post

the sr weighs 490 lbs, ka weighs 493, not much of a change, move the battery to the back and call it a day. this was discussed about a month ago, search for future questions first

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

How do you know it weighs that much?

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

the engines have been weighed in the past. quoted from the SCC swap article, "With the transmission, turbo, and alternator, the SR20DET weighs 490 lbs. The KA24E we removed weighed 493 lbs."

That number is with a SOHC engine, so the added weight of a DOHC KA might be plus a few more pounds pushing it to 495 -497. It's still a negligable amount of weight though. If you ask me, they're bothe freaking heavy engines to pick up with no harness. No fun :(

Onizuka
Posts: 8450
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 5:24 pm
Car: 91 Nissan S13 coupe SR20DET
89 Nissan S14 hatch SR20DE

Post

my stock redtop + transmission weighed 527 including the weight of the pallet and steel restraining straps, so 490 sound accurate. SR = 490lbs, KA + turbo weighs like 510-20lbs, RB25's weigh more like 650 lbs because of the massive transmission and large iron block.

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

My 89 hatch with SR weighs 2475. This is with a removed rear seat, no a/c, and no p/s.

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

Right, so a 2.4 L iron block weighs 4 lbs more than a 2.0 L alluminum block. Seems pointless to use such heavy alluminum dont you think.

canadianwarship
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2003 6:03 pm

Post

:thinker I know! Maybe the turbo &c. has some weight to it.

crzycav86
Posts: 3836
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:28 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX KAT

Post

SRdave240 wrote:My 89 hatch with SR weighs 2475. This is with a removed rear seat, no a/c, and no p/s.


How hard is it to drive the car with no power steering?

I heard someone tell me that in order to get the feel of a car with no power steering, turn the car off while the car is rolling, and try to steer. Needless to say, it was really difficult. Is it really that difficult to drive with no power steering?

User avatar
quiksilvia
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 7:09 am
Car: 95 s14 se
Contact:

Post

at first its a lil more work, but i got used to it and i dont even think about it now.

crzycav86
Posts: 3836
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2003 1:28 pm
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX KAT

Post

..so it's not the same as steering with the engine off?... because there is no way driving it that way could be anything but annoyingly difficult.

User avatar
quiksilvia
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 7:09 am
Car: 95 s14 se
Contact:

Post

if u arent moving then u have to do all steering, at a little speed it gets easy

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

OK, I gotta clear up something. The SCC article is worded kinda funny and you have to read it closely to see what it is actually saying...

"Our engine, which came in a complete front clip, was an early red top with 60,000 kilometers on it. With the transmission, turbo and alternator, the SR20DET weighs 490 lbs. The KA24E we removed weighed 493 lbs. "

This means the KA24e block weighs as much as the SR block, transmission, turbo, and alternator.

Also, as far as power steering goes. It is not difficult once you remove the belt and vent the system.

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

This would make more sense, but still too bizarre. So now the ka weighs several hundred pounds more than the sr? The sr uses the same transmission, no?

SRdave240
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 8:16 pm

Post

No, the difference is about the weight of a transmission which is less than 100 lbs.

User avatar
Hijacker
Posts: 14373
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:57 am
Car: '92 240sx Convertible
'94 F-150
Location: Fredericksburg, VA

Post

quiksilvia wrote:if u arent moving then u have to do all steering, at a little speed it gets easy


i remember on my tempo, i blew the serpentiine belt which was running my AC, Alt, and PS pump. I've been used to driving power assisted cars all my life, so when i felt the belt go and all of a sudden, my wheel wouldn't turn as easy, I got a little freaked out. Especially cause I was in the middle of running a mountain pass with a friend behind me. But driving a manual steered car does get easier as you do it more.

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

14.5drift wrote:Rb guy says his is 46/56 in a s13, but I was wondering what the dist. would be after ca/sr swap.


This is horse doo-doo. There is no way a larger, heavier, and not to mention turbo'd RB could give better weight distribution than a stock KA. 46/56 my booty, maybe closer to 60/40 (just a guess). IIRC, a stock s13 hatch w/ KA has a 55/45 weight distribution (according to a nissan ad).

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

damn it I keep typen it wrong. To clear it up is it is 56 front and 44 rear, and the car is 53/47 from the factory. Sorry for the mix up

User avatar
quiksilvia
Posts: 3197
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2003 7:09 am
Car: 95 s14 se
Contact:

Post

tenkawa_akito wrote:i remember on my tempo, i blew the serpentiine belt which was running my AC, Alt, and PS pump.......Especially cause I was in the middle of running a mountain pass with a friend behind me.
.............er

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

14.5drift wrote:damn it I keep typen it wrong. To clear it up is it is 56 front and 44 rear, and the car is 53/47 from the factory. Sorry for the mix up


That's a little easier for me to believe...the fact that this measurement was probably taken from a car w/ no accessories either (a/c or p/s) makes it even easier. Let me ask you though, did this car have a RB20det or a RB25det? I've heard that a RB25det's transmission is much heavier than the one found on a RB20det. Just curious.

14.5drift
Posts: 274
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 9:28 am

Post

twas an rb25 with the battery in the trunk, check it out http://www.nissaninfiniticlub....45754


Return to “SR20DET Forum (rear-drive)”