rn79870 wrote:Try keeping up. The oil companies are paying the "royalty" for the oil that the taxpayers bought when they bought Alaska. The taxpayers should be the ones getting the royalty. Clear now?
Yes, I understand they pay royalties, we've already talked about that, and if you come here trying to get royalties out of the iron ore used for steel to build a building in CA, you can be sure to be put on the next flight right back to CA. This is what the mayhem would be like, you demand it from one state then all states are going to be demanded to give up their royalties to everyone and everyone's going to be mad, which it shouldn't be. It would be like states sharing their tax money. There is no logic to your idea here besides that somehow you paid for part of Alaska back in 1867 (which was paid for in cash), yet the state still has the right to its minerals whether the land was purchased or won during a war. And if you really do want your money back, based on populations and the $2600/person that I think was stated, you'd get a whopping $5.75!
I'm not quite sure where private enterprise comes in since it is private enterprise developing the oil fields. Either I'm confused or you're not explaining something and assuming I know something. To me, mentioning private enterprise in this conversation means you're trying to hint at the fact that these oil companies are state-owned.