IBCoupe wrote:They do that to cover their butts on copyright. You don't get hit for copying someone else's work. They do, 'cause they did the copying.
Actually, if Jaye is the one that's accepting the agreement on the Kodak print station and hits the print button he's the one that did the copying. I've not seen a Wal-Mart yet where the employee did anything other than enter a print code to enable printing or change out the ribbon & paper, maybe things have changed since I left B'Town. Wal-Mart originally did this for professional photographs but have now "empowered" their employees to be the copy police. I'd be surprised if any of them could tell me how long a copyright is good for, for what purpose I could make a copy of a copyrighted work, or even begin to explain the concept of Fair Use.
_b.jaye_ wrote:wheres the line? what if you painted/sketched someone elses photography, took a pic of your work & tried to print it? what ive done's different. but not thaaat different.
The Fair Use line can be pretty nebulous. If you paint a picture of Superman you own your picture but you can't reprint it without permission from DC Comics as Superman is their intellectual property...you're reproducing their work. I'm a little uspet about how broad an umbrella some IP's actually have. A couple of specific examples, DC & Marvel Comics own the term "superhero" (wtf?) and the NFL owns the term "Super Sunday", and yet I doubt Bill Watterson has collected any royalties over the years from Calvin pissing on various objects.
Here's a dated, but interesting article.
Jaye, just head on over FedEx Office over in Bloomington (the Sony printers they have make better prints than the Kodaks at Wal-Mart) and make your prints. Then go over to
The Irish Lion for a well deserved pint and a plate of puffballs.
