VTC Dyno graph

Discuss topics related to the VH41DE, VH45DE, VK45DE, and VK56DE engines.
Stinky
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:12 am

Post

There has been some discussion about setting the VTC rpm and I figured I'd share this. I did some runs with the 450sx with the VTC set to stock, set ON, and set OFF. You will notice that with the VTC OFF you lose power under 4800rpm. With the VTC left ON you lose some power after 4800rpm. So basically the 4800rpm set point is right where needs to be.



irax
Posts: 841
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 10:04 pm
Car: VQ35DER Powered S14.3

Post

can you make it so at 4800 rpm the vtc will turn off?

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

^ Isnt that what its doing there?

You can see the the red 'stock VTC' line follows the 'VTC on' line, then starts following the 'VTC off' line after ~4800rpm. Seems to me that its doing its job quite well. It may not make more peak power than leaving it on or off, but it makes more across the range...

User avatar
sijoko
Posts: 961
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 6:54 am
Car: Black 1994 Infiniti Q45 Turbo, Pearl White 2014 Maxima Sport
Contact:

Post

That's very good info to have. So there's no reason to mess with the Valve Timing Control shut off point.

I was reading in the SAE paper on the VH45DE that Nissan spent 3 years on this engine. I guess they spent quite a few hours on setting up the VTC.


autoworkz
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Jun 07, 2006 3:03 am
Car: 450sx
Contact:

Post

from what i read, it was more like 5 years, project was launched in 1984 and delivered in 89.

User avatar
sijoko
Posts: 961
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 6:54 am
Car: Black 1994 Infiniti Q45 Turbo, Pearl White 2014 Maxima Sport
Contact:

Post

autoworkz wrote:from what i read, it was more like 5 years, project was launched in 1984 and delivered in 89.
The Q45 project was launched in 1984 with the engine development taking 3 years as per the SAE paper #900651 submitted by Nissan on the VH45DE.

Some other tidbits:

- Included angle of the valves: 46 degrees.- Ratio of valve diameter to bore: 0.41.- Engine torque @ 800 rpm: ~ 240 ft. lbs.- Coil-on-plug capability: 37 kv @ 9000 rpms.- Engine block construction: Hypoeutectic silicon alum. w/ 7-10% silicon.- Crankshaft construction: Two-plane forged steel.- Crankshaft features: Fillet rolled journals, Radio frequency hardened.- Crankshaft journals width: Rod = 44.2 mm, Main = 26.5mm.- Low pressure cast-in iron cylinder liners: 3mm thickness.- Piston weight and height: 402 grams & 62.5mm.- Connecting rod construction: High-strength, micro-alloyed free-cut. - Intake runner diameter: Tapers from 46mm to 42mm.- Intake runner length: 420mm.

I understand everything except the description of the connecting rod construction. What do they mean by high-strength, micro-alloyed free-cut? From what I have read so far, the rods are supposed to be forged.

User avatar
Ezekial
Posts: 355
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 4:42 pm
Car: 2001 Nissan 200SX S15

Post

i wonder what the effect of forced induction will be on VCT power / rpm

User avatar
sijoko
Posts: 961
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 6:54 am
Car: Black 1994 Infiniti Q45 Turbo, Pearl White 2014 Maxima Sport
Contact:

Post

Ezekial wrote:i wonder what the effect of forced induction will be on VCT power / rpm
I have been thinking about this alot lately.

My take on VTC and its effects on turbocharging: The valve overlap will send more raw fuel out into the manifolds where it would combust and increase the energy available to spool up the turbo.

The key is to size the turbo with a large enough a/r that it does not become restrictive before the VTC cut-off point. This way you minimize the potential for hot exhaust gases being pushed back into the cylinders due to the valve overlap.

On the other hand if a too small turbine side is used, the VTC can actually be a liability because the excessive backpressure would cause exhaust gases to work their way back into the combustion chambers. Of course, the fix would be turn off the VTC feature in that case.

User avatar
Clifton
Posts: 53
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 1:23 pm
Car: 73' 240Z/7MGTE 71 240Z/L28ET
Contact:

Post

sijoko wrote:
My take on VTC and its effects on turbocharging: The valve overlap will send more raw fuel out into the manifolds where it would combust and increase the energy available to spool up the turbo.

The key is to size the turbo with a large enough a/r that it does not become restrictive before the VTC cut-off point. This way you minimize the potential for hot exhaust gases being pushed back into the cylinders due to the valve overlap.

On the other hand if a too small turbine side is used, the VTC can actually be a liability because the excessive backpressure would cause exhaust gases to work their way back into the combustion chambers. Of course, the fix would be turn off the VTC feature in that case.
I think the a/r would have to be so large that vtc wouldn't even matter. Boost would come on so late. I measured turbine pressure on a T66 with .70 hotside with P and O trims. With the larger P trim I was still 10 psi higher than inlet pressure on a 3l at high boost. Most large overlap n/a cams don't work well with turbo because of the high turbine pressure, and lower manifold pressure.

What's the power dip around 5200 rpms? AFR?

Stinky
Posts: 83
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:12 am

Post

The power dip is from the stock ignition timing. Maybe they dropped the timing to allow for smoother shifts or something? Anyway, you can see here zerothread/194518 that they can be tuned out.


Return to “VH45DE / VK45DE / VK56DE Forum”