vq35de wrote:why don't you investigate a VQ35 short block with VQ30 heads. Another guy around http://www.that dead forum did this. I don't know if he succeded or not. then you get the displacement increase but get to keep all the emissions and throttle control stuff.
slizan99 wrote:the VQ35 crankshaft and connecting rods bolt up to the VQ30DE pistons, so the VQ30DET shouldn't be a problem.
The stroker motor would be for NA puposes only....unless you have lots of balls and boost that compression queen(cough,cough Hal)audtatious wrote:The immobilizer is defiantely a problem. With the $$ spent converting a VQ30 to a stroker, wouldn't it be a better investment to simply add a turbo or SC to the existing motor? Of course, if the existing is trashed and you have to replace it anyway.....
Well, to lower the compression enough to matter it would take more than head gaskets.audtatious wrote:Yeah, but can't you somewhat lower the compression by utilizing a thicker head gasket?
That's the one thing I don't understand. Why would anyone want to waste their time on making the stroker motor if you are limited in what you can do to it due to higher compression. The increase in HP over the stock is limited when you look at the options available via SC or TC.
what's the resulting stroke?cullenj76 wrote:VQ35 Crankshaft, VQ35 Rods and VQ30 Piston Head all bolt right up into the VQ30 block with no problems.
This results in 3316cc or 3.3 liters of displacement
resulting compression is 11:1