Okay, I spent some time researching this and have some opinions now. Not clear that I am right or wrong, but ...
1. First and foremost, the allegation that somehow Diebold must be specifically and intentionally frauding the voters in this situation seems way, way far-fetched.
2. Even if it occurs, the "fact" that it somehow helps Republican and not Democrats also sounds ridiculous. Why are the Democrats so computer-illiterate that they are not able to perpetrate the same fraud?
3. I watched that video at the third link. They have taken random snippets from various people - out of context, without letting them finish the sentence (which might have added information), etc., etc., etc. A deliberate effort to create a Luddite fear-mongering situation, aimed directly at the people in our society who do not know much about computers.
4. I suspect voting computers are subject to vote fraud problems, and yes, I will also agree that some problems might have occurred. Teething problems. Traditional paper voting is also subject to fraud! Numerous cases of that exist - over the centuries frankly. In particular, the "paper trail" that people talk about is just so much crap - no one goes back and looks at any of the paper ballots after the election is over. And they are destroyed after a while.
srellim234 wrote:Plus, no one is allowed to look at the computer code, including the people that wrote it!
Ummm ... I did not get that from any of the three links. Did I miss something?
Regardless of which ... my current opinion: this issue reeks of way too much deliberate fear-mongering conspiracy theory, without enough facts and reality-checks, to make this issue be anything more than a tempest in a teapot.
Computer security can be done right (banks, the IRS, etc. do just fine), and once any teething issues are resolved, this will be the way to go. Inspite of the Luddites.
I hope I am not wrong about this, of course!
Z