so what's the 1/4 time? and let us know what the actual hp is after a dyno! 405whp sounds nice tho! If you're getting that then I'll definitely go SC!kmech_7 wrote:yes it can run with the E55 amg. the benz goes from 0-60 in 4.5. mine goes in about 4.1 or 4.2........
i know that in the 1/8 mile i get 7.5-8.0's all the time.
and yes im pushing about 405whp. 475ish at the crank if i did the calculations right.
If this was true then F1 wouldn't have used them in the past...and WRC wouldn't use them currently...and 90% of the factory cars that come with f/i wouldn't have them. A correctly set-up and tuned turbo system will have almost no lag and full power can be had at any rpm while with a s/c you have to wait till the rpm's are redline. Also a car with a turbo can very easily be modulated with throttle as it is with a s/c system. F1 banned turbo's back in the 80's b/c motors were making way to much power...bmw's 1.5L 4-cyl was making more than 1500hp...they never got an exact number b/c the dyno's didn't go high enough for it.Kenrik wrote:Supercharge is better for a road course/curves due to the power being in the whole RPM range.
Turbo is better for straightline/highway/open tracks
Actually I've seen good numbers with someone that had a vortech and 75shot...The Vortech makes most of its power in the upper RPM band. If you hit NO2 just after the 60' mark, you'll be significantly quicker because your power band will be much wider!kmech_7 wrote:you do NOT want to use a shot of NOS in a supercharger setup.... the only time you use it is for cooling the intercooler air.
I have taken this 'thing' to the track and i am putting up about 8.1 on the 1/8 mile.
Uhh? This is a huge myth. First thing I'll tell you is that regardless if boost is available at all RPM's, the winner of the race will be the one that can keep the most power to the ground at all times. This means, that even with a supercharger, you still need to keep the RPM's up by remaining in the lowest gear possible to take advantage of the torque multiplication. This renders low to mid RPM's useless on a road course. If you are halfway decent on a race track, keeping a decently matched turbo spooled is not going to be hard. Before you cite turbo response, consider that when you exit a turn, you make a gradual shift from steering input to throttle input. Short of way oversizing the turbo for the motor, by the time you are needing the power the turbo provides, it's already spooling.Kenrik wrote:Supercharge is better for a road course/curves due to the power being in the whole RPM range.
Turbo is better for straightline/highway/open tracks
I prefer the Supercharger...
I tend to be biased towards turbos myself. However, if I were looking at a kit, I'd be a little reluctant to go with a turbo as they have had much more history of blowing up motors. I'd speculate that this has to do with the nature of a turbo being independent of engine speed which requires more tuning parameters. Superchargers will be much more predictable in airflow and boost since it is tied down to engine RPM, so less consideration has to be made towards planning for early spool, or an overboost situation.Jacko3 wrote:C-Kwik, what do you think?
Put the $$$$ in an IRA or 401k plan.You'll thank me for the advice in 25 yearsJacko3 wrote:In addition, I am of the beleif that someone willcome up with another performance part that will increase horse power only slightly without the use of a TT or SC. Or, the price of the SC will fall to a reasonable level as a result of market forces of demand and supply. In the next year or two, something good is bound to happen to the prices of these equipment. I think the prices are very high. I shall sit and wait to see if they drop. In fact, I was offered a brand new Vortech Supercharger for $4700 in January 2008, with no taxes or shipping fees. I didn' have the money so, I declined.
LoL I have been doing this since i was 18telcoman wrote:
Put the $$$$ in an IRA or 401k plan.You'll thank me for the advice in 25 years
- the stupid... I started at 20 though.Tampa G35 Sedan 6MT wrote:
LoL I have been doing this since i was 18
I have built up about 30k in my IRA and about 12k in my 401k lol
And it is thanks to good advice like that, I will be so well set at 40 it won't be even funny!
I still want a SC lol
DJ
I have been reading a lot about the vortech and spraying. I also did a little more follow up with a local G and Z shop in Orl and they are throwing a 35 shot on the front mount getting an extra 30whp when you want it and haven't had anything blow yet. This is the set up I'm doing they also have done a 50 shot but only two runs went really well. I would build my motor going any higher then that.USAF_G35_Guy wrote: Hawt dude!
I agree with Joe..screw workin with header lol..I've already got aftermarket so I might as well keep em and go SC. I think I just may have to do this instead of ST. I've been thinking about all types of FI for awhile and definitely don't wanna do TT cause IMO...it's just more stuff to go wrong. So, does anyone know how a SC does with a 50 or 100 shot of NOS?
thanx bud!G_whizz wrote:I edited some of the threadjacking for you
ya....i do....sorryG_whizz wrote:I would email him Greg...he goes MIA from time to time..