Post by
M4T5 »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/m4t5-u123303.html
Wed Feb 04, 2009 9:49 am
Global warming is no joke. It has already shown its effects.... we won't get into that...I have to disagree about the SUV's getting anywhere close to 8 or even 15mpg...average.... yes I said average.The new Ford Expeditions and the GM Suvs (Tahoes, Suburbans, Yukons, and Denalis) all can achieve real world averages of 15-18+ MPG! Yeah, I said it. A lot of the V8 1/2 ton trucks can do it too. Why do I say this? I've owned both Ford & GM Suv's and trucks. All 2000 models and up. The GM vehicles tend to get a little better fuel economy than the Fords do. At least up until 2008 that is. I've seen that a lot of full size truck & SUV makers have increased power and their fuel economy on their vehicles for the 2009/ 2010 models. Not sure how they accomplished that. The ones that complain of SUV's and trucks are mostly the rice burner owners who achieve 30+ mpg. Start dismantling the engineering and look at the weight to power to mpg ratios. I can tell you one thing, that Smart for Two car.... is not any engineering break through by any means! I think it is a pointless car that is not anywhere near as fuel efficient as it should be! Plus it is one of the ugliest cars on the road. Just to think Mercedes makes this car............
J