now thats the question of the day!elwesso wrote:Wow... Pretty cool project... i'll get the semantics out of the way so that we can start prodding you with questions about your swap..
The engine wiring is pretty much the same throughout the years.. Main thingwiring wise that changed was the addition of the LAN system in the 94s, but that does certainly not effect you at all...
The bottom line is, between 90-95 Q45, the ECU's are all compatible within the years, so that means the pin-outs are the same. I currently run a 1991 Q45 ECU in my 1994 Q45t, and its just fine... So that being said, i think probably the only difference is 2 things: The wiring listed in the FSM may have different colored wires listed (I kinda doubt it though), and some of the connectors are different (meaning just a different design, still the same wires).
The cliff notes: I think if you follow the 94 Q45 wiring diagram you will be just fine...
Now, where can we get that adapter plate for the 6 speed for the VH45?
There is room for a clutch pedal and a master cylinder, its "snug" but there's room.450Z wrote:As I recall the last I heard from him was when I asked him if there was enough room to put a clutch pedal assembly and master cylinder in the car.What do you think?
You will have to remove the parking brake, 100% for sure on that...anlasak wrote: There is room for a clutch pedal and a master cylinder, its "snug" but there's room.
There is a possibility of interference from the parking brake though.
What kind of metal did you decide to use for the adapter plate?
How thick a plate did you decide to use?
This wouldn't be a pic of yours would it?
Guess you know about the chain guide issue? Might want to read about what T-3 does to rehabilitate JDM take outs before you nestle that baby into the 240Z chassis.450Z wrote:I now have a VH45DE mounted to a T56 6 speed trans which is now mounted in a 1972 Datsun 240Z. .
Yup.If you go to my Car Domain website you might get some appreciation for what is involved in making this happen. http://www.cardomain.com/ride/563982anlasak wrote: There is room for a clutch pedal and a master cylinder, its "snug" but there's room.
There is a possibility of interference from the parking brake though.
What kind of metal did you decide to use for the adapter plate?I used 6061-T6 aluminum.
How thick a plate did you decide to use?It worked out that 3/4" was about right. The clutch and related shim got everything in alignement. I used a Stage III Z32TT clutch that I had the GM spline put in the clutch disc.
This wouldn't be a pic of yours would it?
maxnix wrote:Guess you know about the chain guide issue? Might want to read about what T-3 does to rehabilitate JDM take outs before you nestle that baby into the 240Z chassis.
Please keep us posted on your project.
Modified by maxnix at 10:14 PM 3/21/2006
Should be about 110 Amps.450Z wrote:Thats right. But it still does not add up to anywhere near the max output of the alternator (looks like about 221Amps?).
Huh?Whats a camshaft encoder?450Z wrote:On a similar topic do you know if anyone has a parts engine that I could get a camshaft encoder for my 92?
Hmm, first time I've heard a Crank Angle Sensor (CAS) called an encoder.450Z wrote:On most cars there is a crank angle sensor to allow the ECCS to control the inj and ign. On Nissans they are mounted on the drivers side exhaust camshaft.
The next crank might be the last. one never knows. Not a gamble anyone experienced with the issue would take a bet on. Lots of 1990-1993 owners have found their guides in pieces, and there is no better time to rehabilitate the engine than when it is out.450Z wrote:Thanks, I have read about that issue. At this point I just want to get this thing running, then I'll work on the the details.