That good sir, would be me.Ezekial wrote:nice photo's ...
who hacked the bottom runners on RHS bank?
Yeah, the EGR Valve is the main culprit, PCV Valve adds to the icky-ness.Mettler wrote:Is that because of EGRG ?
At the moment just a basic rebuild along with some slight modification to the ports. I'm content with the stock cams, *at the moment*, but I'm definately fond of the idea of beefier springs and a set of inners. I just can't seem to find a set of inners.elwesso wrote:....What are you doing to your heads? Just a basic rebuild, or any goodies (new cams I hope wiht some beefier valve springs)
I didn't even think to look on the Australian forums. Thanks!Ezekial wrote:search the gtir forums ... even in oz ... worse case ... get it mailed to me and i'll send them over for you
mine were $50 for 32 ...
Part time, but the owner is nice enough to let me come in after hours and work on my own *stuff*.defrag010 wrote:sweet, you work at a machine shop too?
is this on a 41 or a 45??? Im not sure if the 41 clearance is the same, but it should be because they have similar compression ratios... Just something to think about, if you could find that out that theres no flycutting of the factory pistons needed for some higher lift cams, thatd be swell!Mettler wrote:According to Mr Hartley here in NZ, he does cam grinds that increase the lift and duration, with no piston interference issues. I dunno how much more lift you get, but I'll find that stuff out.
Either/or. He advised me the valvetrain is identical on both, as are the conrods.... he has a VH50DE running his cam grind, and I'm pretty sure he mentioned his extra stroke being an offset grind on the crank... it works mint! To do a 4.5 swap all you need to change are pistons and crank (and obviously bearings).elwesso wrote:
is this on a 41 or a 45??? Im not sure if the 41 clearance is the same, but it should be because they have similar compression ratios... Just something to think about, if you could find that out that theres no flycutting of the factory pistons needed for some higher lift cams, thatd be swell!
Nah man, same conrods.elwesso wrote:i thought the pistons were the same, but the stroke was just smaller.... guess not?
also if you can figure out how much lift he's running thatd be really helpful!
So the VH45DE has a higher deck? Doesn't appear so in the engine bay, but that's sure not definitive.Mettler wrote:Nah man, same conrods.
If you think about it there's only 50ccs difference per cylinder made up by a 6.7mm difference in stroke. The crank has this extra throw on it, and the compression height is moved up by the same amount on the 4.5 pistons.
Stroke isn't dependent on rod length.
It wouldnt have to have a higher deck (it might but i doubt it).... The offset on the crankshaft is just less.... I was having a momentary lapse of the obvious, but thanks for clearing that up Shaun!!!maxnix wrote:So the VH45DE has a higher deck? Doesn't appear so in the engine bay, but that's sure not definitive.
If she was staying N/A I probably wouldelwesso wrote:dude if your gonna go to the trouble of rebuilding your heads yo uneed to get some nasty cams reground...
I'm seriously considering it.defrag010 wrote:heck, you should do the drop-in dodge spring/buick retainer that I documented!
She will be getting a supercharger, a manual gearbox, and a few add ons. I'm also going to enlargen the intake passages a bit over stock to allow less restriction. Even a little less restriction will be a benefit for me.maxnix wrote:Why are you rebuilding the heads?
If you don't prefer the siamese intake ports, why not go to the later single port design? According to Q45tech, airflow restriction on either is neglible.
Nah the deck height is the same, just 6.7mm more stroke on the VH45 crank, and 6.7mm reduction in compression height in the VH45 pistons. Same deck height, same conrods.maxnix wrote:So the VH45DE has a higher deck? Doesn't appear so in the engine bay, but that's sure not definitive.