SeVa-S13 wrote:3.8 liters of pure muscle! Grrr!
that's a Mustang dork, I believe the Camaro was a 3.4 liter. The 89 and back was a 2.8...
it might've jumped to a 3.8 at some point in the late 90's, but I don't think it did...
and the Camaro isn't a muscle car persay, it's always been a pony car. Muscle is straight line only, believe it or not, the camaro was actually intended to turn too! A Z 28, while not being one of the best handling cars, is capable(it's solid axle is gonna forever hinder it though not too mention weight balance too). Granted, GM's used the same suspension for most of the car's life, the old Z 28's were very dominant cars in Trans Am and the like.
but yeah, an NA Z32 is no real feat, unless it's running a 14:1 compression or something...
it being an auto doesn't help it any.
I speak from experience, they bite.