1_Sleek_Versa wrote:I think the Versa's with regular auto transmission achieve WAY better gas mileage than those with CVT.
Could it be?
Clearly not the case. US EPA economy ratings peg the 4-speed auto for a full 3 MPG less in city driving than the CVT (24 MPG vs 27 MPG); purely empirical data from this site confirms this as well.
My wife's commute is partially highway, partially urban, and the highway isn't of the wide-open, cruise-control variety, so it hardly qualifies as such in my book.
Last tank: 283.7 miles, 9.642 gallons = 29.4 MPG
Average of previous 10 tanks: 29.0 MPG
Lifetime average: 29.3 MPG
All-time Max: 34.1 MPG (highway, summer)All-time Low: 23.9 MPG (city, winter)
I think the Versa's weight is mostly to blame for the occasionally poor mileage. Unlike some of the lighter cars in its class, the Versa's mass requires more energy to motivate, making the fuel economy 'sweet spot' much smaller and therefore more difficult to target. Other cars with slightly better power-to-weight ratios tend to have a little wider tolerance for fuel consumption, but it certainly hasn't been a factor with our Versa, so I can't complain.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, the EPA ratings also have a margin of error built in, just check any new-car window sticker. It will have the city/highway rating in large, bold print, and beneath that, you'll find the range for city and range for highway. Few of the mileage complaints I've come across fall outside of these margins. FYI, this margin is usually +/- 20% (thus making the CVT city range 22 MPG to 32 MPG, with an overall CITY rating of 27). Anything within this range is considered normal.