I think it's a great idea but I'm sure JWT will not be able to alter the ecu into the variable timing issue, only because he would have to add that circuitry to your existing ecu which might take a while. variable timing isn't all its cracked up to be--retarding a cam gives you less low rpm and more top rpm--more advance is more low and less high--you can get the same effect if you install an msd with variable timing control like I have in my 76 camaro. It does the same thing even while you're driving--with the variable timing I knocked a full second off my 1/4 and 60ft times were even better due to less slippage at the tires. But for every day driving I leave it alone although I only drive my camaro on saturdays due to 6 miles to the gallon!! I would say the fabrication will be the easy part, the hard part is the ecu! Might end up costing well over 900.00 for that ecu alone!!technoman wrote:Why can’t I just think of a way to integrate a VVT intake Sprocket on my ka cam? I have a maxima head just sitting here and im begging my friend who is a machinist who can work wonders with aluminum. I’m looking at a 94 VG30DE 4 cam 94maxima motor. This engine has VVT on both intake cams front side and back side. Six coil packs with no rocker arms laid out just like a KA cam set. If I can integrate that intake sprocket I can have VVT. On a ka You must under stand the coiled sprocket to no that’s how VVT is achieved. I need to custom bolt this VVT sprocket on the end of my KA intake cam and make sure the exhaust sprocket will work. Possibly use the maxima exhaust cam sprocket not VVT. I will need to cut a whole in the upper timing cover for the sprocket to stick out. And work out the chain issue. I could custom fab a plastic cover to shield it and hold oil in. And hope like hell JWT could alter my ECU to understand my fuel/air curve with an intake cam that advances and retards. Imputs please?
Technoman!
change timing electronically or change timing physically---same exact concept variable timing thats why they call it that keep your static timing the same only means distributor stays in exact spot but you still change the timing when you retard or advance. msd has the kit to vary the timing with import engines that does the same exact thing that V.V.T does except at an electronic level. MSD satnds for what you said but the add on kits they also supply with the kit are the ones that vary the timing. For example my cam runs out of juice at 6800rpm's but with the timing kit I can get it to 8000 even though the cam phase is still the same How did I do that?777aaron wrote:Changing ignition timing and changing the phase of your camshaft are two TOTALLY different things,they both affect performance but are still different.Using the MSD you can change when the spark occours,plus you also get the advantage of having the plug fire more than once to help in having more efficent combustion,hence the name Multiple Spark Discharge.Now on the other hand changing your intake cam phasing(this means the amount of degrees the cam is in at in relation to T.D.C. on the engine)would actually alter when the valves open and close.You are right as far as the engine making power at different r.p.m. byadvancing and retarding the cam though.
One more thing to think about,vvt on a small or big block Chevy (or almost any domestic cam in block V-8 for that matter) would not be able to reap the same effects since the cam not only controls intake,but your exhaust valves also,yes you would see some gain,but nothing close to what you would see on a engine w/seperate cams for intake and exhaust valves.
EXACTLY!!! somewhat... I retarted the timing thru spark control which is not the same as varying valve timing but the same concept. Your phasing-static, and initial stay the same but varying the spark timing give you a broader spectrum of power without smashing a cylinder with a valve!! I like that more then the idea of varying the valves in my opinion but I think both work just about the sametechnoman wrote:Well you did'nt change the valve timming but you changed spark plug firing. Id say the that's the most important because i don't why let me think.
I have the vari-curve controller connected to the digital 7 that varies it either way--advance or retard but not the valves which I already posted777aaron wrote:You said that msd offers the kit for import engines,how would this adopt to a domestic V-8 (I am guessing that is what you are running)?I agree that msd is a much better system , I also know from personel experience as I went from a H.E.I. with an accel coil and good spring advance kit to a 6AL setup my car went from running a 8.10 to a 7.80's , and yes it would also run more rpms , but this was not because the cam timing was changed , as I do not think it would be able to do this through an msd box as it only controls ignition and has nothing to do with when the valves open , remember that we are also talking about cars w/ no E.C.U..
That blown 406 is the reason your poor LOL!! J/K my small chevy only has 550 intake 565 exhaust so I did have a slight problem when I went to my 385 fast burn heads. I shaved it to 59 cc's and cannot go any further!!! these are on a 327 too... but its in a sled (76 camaro) I'd die to put it in my 240 but I would have to invest in goodyear stocks since my camaro has 15x9.5 in the rear with 265/50/15 and I have to baby the crap out of the throttle just to stop the burn Imagine that motor in a 92 240sx!! SMOKIN!!!!!777aaron wrote:I was unaware that you had already said that because I'm just a poor boy w/ some super slow webtv:( but it gets the job done for checking out what you guys have to say which is all I really use it for anyway (or care about for that matter).As far as smashing your valves that is totally dependant on the engine itself , but it sounds like we both know that can be a problem in a small blockchevy,especially w/some decent compressoion and a big cam:ylsuper !!
Man I could tell you horror stories about that beast!!! I call it my wuustang beater!! I loved pissing them guys off!! But the real reason why I got into imports was jerry rome owner of jerry rome nissan owned a 92 300zxtt that he worked like hell and beat the crap out of my camaro all the time. I could only beat him when I use the nos otherwise forget it.. He convinced me to buy my 240 so it went from there and here I am!! One of the problems I had or have is usually owners of chevies or fords are rednecks but you cant beat the dollar per horsepower figures achieved I got into imports because I want to high performance my nissan to beat the chevies but its gonna take money---a whole lot of spending money but I have the patience but not the money (yet) I love my 240 it handles like a hot knife thru buttertechnoman wrote:I'd die to put it in my 240
yes you would die. sounds scary man!
does 10.3 @130 without juice and 150 shot gives me traction problems so I only do 9.63 and they kick me off the quarter because I have no rollcage!!! LOL!!! I'd love to stick it in my 240 but here in assachusetts you have to pass emissions from 79 and up!! they would laugh me to death oh well. I'm going to be selling it in a few days because I'm bored of it.. know anyone looking for a beast?777aaron wrote:My 240 engie is blown-up,the malibu is n.a.all the way.Sounds like you got a pretty quick car grygst.
777aaron wrote:Damn fast.I never got my car on a 1/4 mile but I would gues low twelves,maybe high 11's with some slicks.I know I don't have any problem taking out my budies 2002 ZO6with his 100 shot of juice,and I can still get him by 4-5 cars across the local bridge.I'm selling my car too so I can get a engine for my 240,just gotten tired of it.
777aaron wrote:Yeah,the challenge is cool,nothing like making your brain hurt to get you motivated.I've been around chevies my whole life,my Father owns a racing engine and high performance machine shop,but about 95% of the stuff we do is fo N.H.R.A. super stock and competition eliminator.I love that high winding scream of a good import,that reminds me of a bike.I would love to build a twin turbo 434 small block with D.F.I. or F.A.S.T. injection but it is pretty cost prohibitive.