USCC

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
Dirtylou
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:27 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX RMS13

Post

Is it just me or was the GT-R in somewhat of a disappointment. 552whp and still runs high 12s. Does that seem right? Was it the driver? Personally, I think the whole competition is not what it used to be. What happened to the Vipers, Supras and 'Vettes with tire liquifying power? To me the whole pushrod exclusion rule is dumb. The new competition seems like it's more import biased and rules are in favor for them also(all but the R32VW are Japanese). I may own a Nissan but I realize that there are other fish in the pond. Also, I never thougth that I would see a Miata in the USCC. Granted it's good...really good(it beat the GT-R on the road course), but I'm sure there are other cars that are nominees for USCC than it. Please don't think that I'm bashing the cars...I give ALL the cars MAJOR props for making it(all but 5/10 cars had 1g on the pad) but I guess I'm use to the previous contests. ALso, whats with the mr2 winning the show car award...for those with the mag. look at it on page 61. What's with the side skirts and the trunk lid? I'm glad I got that out...I feel a lot better.


Altiman94
Posts: 5891
Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2003 12:13 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

the whole point of the compact car challenge is to test compact cars, namely from japan. Not corvettes, vipers, and IMO a skyline shouldnt even be included. It should be purely cars that we have here and are modified. Ie, dsm's, s13/14, celica, any other small compact car you can name. I dont believe they need to be testing corvettes or vipers, thats what muscle car mags can do.

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

the gt-r had some sort of problem, if you read the whole thing, it wasnt feeling too good from what they said.

NSR_s30
Posts: 15113
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 5:10 pm
Car: '99 Ford F250 7.3L Diesel
'71 Datsun 240Z
Contact:

Post

As much as I love SCC, the USCC was a disappointment this year. Yes so was the GT-R. It did worse then last year? WTF? Whats up with the only the yellow cars winning?

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

Yet another stupid yellow car won

I too was disappointed in the USCC overall this year. Maybe someday I'll put my car in it. lol

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

run the z32 next year, the application is in the mag

User avatar
nsrZ32
Posts: 20795
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 8:27 am
Car: 90 Nissan 300ZX TT
78 Datsun 280Z
71 Datsun 521 Pickup
98 Nissan Sentra 2.0 SE
02 Nissan Altima 3.5 SE
01 Ford Focus S2
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

nismofly wrote:run the z32 next year, the application is in the mag
I dunno about next year lol Still more I'd like to do and get done with the car. One of these years though.

User avatar
Thrwnsprkz
Posts: 1057
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 2:40 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

awww do it, your Z whould dominate so much of the competition, only thing id be afraid of whould be beaking something, they tend to like to do that... but seriously how hot whould that be to rock the pages of SCC in a NICO Z... my buddy accually just showed me the qualifyers... i hadnt seen it, my subscription ran out as the comp started... so i didnt know who won, my money was on an Evo too... only for publicity... and since everyones saying yellow won I take that as MR. Two?

User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

SCC had zero kind things to say about the performance of the GTR and it's 1/4mile pilot, Sean Morris.. no surprise that once again, the car was rushed, hurried, not sorted, and completely unprepared for the competition. Everybody on another forum bows to this guy, but how many times does the GT-R have to fail, for somebody with more time, money, or both, to get a proper GT-R into the field??

"Not as easy as it looks" will be the retort, or "if you only knew the prep time that already goes in"etc etc..

If it takes that much time, and still failure is the result, maybe either:

Skyline GT-R isn't that great of a car, orTime to pass the torch

Dirtylou
Posts: 666
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:27 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX RMS13

Post

WOw ....just saw your cardomain page...it seems like a serious contender now. It looks like an impressive machine.nice.

SeVa-S13
Posts: 8478
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 9:11 pm
Car: '05 GTO 6spd

Post

550whp and 12's? Maybe a Supra with a Skyline conversion?

I can run 12's with my RB20 with an FMIC, t/3t4 and a piggyback. Hardly rocket science.

Get a competent person that's focused on the project and with the funds to do it properly and that car could easily dominate. I mean it's not even hard to get an RB26 to double its stock output. Some GT twins (2540s maybe?) Thicker FMIC and radiator, some pistons, Profec B and a PowerFC. Give it some dyno time and drag radials...you'll decimate in the 1/4 mile and still have a good enough powerband to road race with those pesky Miatas.

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

like i said they willingly admitted the car had big problems, even the driver said that. maybe theyll get a different skyline for next year.

gabossie
Posts: 9632
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 7:03 am
Car: Your mom
Contact:

Post

... maybe they'll get rid of Sean Morris. Never liked that guy, and he seems to not be able to pull his **** together very well.

User avatar
SmithSR
Posts: 5021
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 3:16 pm
Car: 240sx

Post

nismofly wrote:like i said they willingly admitted the car had big problems, even the driver said that. maybe theyll get a different skyline for next year.
They say that every year.. time for another tuner with either:

more capabilitymore timemore money

or any combination of all three to step up


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I was pretty disappointed by this year's USCC. Last year's kicked ***, with that Ultima GTR and such. And whoever said the USCC was for sport compacts only? It stands for Ultimate Street Car Competition, not Ultimate Sport Compact Competition. ANY street car should be able to enter, that's the appeal.

User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

SmithSR wrote:
They say that every year.. time for another tuner with either:

more capabilitymore timemore money

or any combination of all three to step up
well last year it was doing great until something rather happened, i dont quite remember. the one they were supposed to run last year was a lot better, but then got sold even after getting voted in, so they couldnt run it.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Take a look at the scores from last year. That Skyline, even after breaking, placed very high. I don't remember where exacly, but if they car had kept running it would have taken the competition. It did very well in everything it was able to run, and then there was a drivetrain issue if I remember right.


User avatar
nismofly
Posts: 12505
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 3:16 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX Hatch

Post

ya, and in this one morris did say it wasnt the same car from last year, something missing from it. still though skyline has to win it one of these days.


Return to “General Chat”