you miss the point...saying that because its C++ it must be good is a stupid assumption - you can write a crap program in any language (and you can write a good one in any language, though cpu/graphics intensive program written well in c++ will be better than one written well in .net)
only argument i have against c++ is that you can write a .net app for both win32/pocket pc (and all wince that support .net) with same codebase/executable - but from the looks of the screenshots, theres simply too much in nistune to be able to pack into a ppc screen (without a lot of mucking around to account for size difference) so thats not really a valid point.
darkhalf wrote:well this is what i hate.... you spend literally hundreds of hours developing something and then it gets bagged by someone who doesnt know exactly what they are talking about
think you're reading too much into a throwaway line (that "programming language a is better than b") that meant very little other than to counter that the programming language inherently dictates the quality of the program. i even put the :p at the end to make it more obvious that i was expecting someone to argue the opposite. the quality of the program, not the language its written in, matters.
from the site, whenever i last checked, it wasnt too clear that you could use the software for non-realtime ecu setups - ie with a standard consult interface/stock ecu - if you can, thatd be awesome because it looks to be coming along nicely.
do wideband inputs work with standard consult/stock ecu setup?