Im just gona say you began with a quote from Bertrand Russell. I think its better for everyone that way.Armelius wrote:I end with a quote from Bertrand Russell:
The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was “given” by a foreign power to another people for the creation of a new state. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from their own country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate? A permanent just settlement of the refugees in their homeland is an essential ingredient of any genuine settlement in the Middle East. We are frequently told that we must sympathise with Israel because of the suffering of the Jews in Europe at the hands of the Nazis. [...] What Israel is doing today cannot be condoned, and to invoke the horrors of the past to justify those of the present is gross hypocrisy.
—Bertrand Russell, 31 January 1970
That is the most rediculous statement I've ever heard. You mean to tell me that Jews funded Nazi's to kill 6 million Jews just to gain public sentiment to get them relocated back to their homeland? Completely retarded!Armelius wrote:Obviously the Jewish Agency and the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee are zionist organizations that funded Nazi Germany and Communist Russia to get people relocated to Palestine/Israel in order to save them, which in my opinion is no different than funding terrorism.
So are all the Muslim countries in the middle east. So is Utah. So are numerous other countries in the world. Many of which receive foreign aid from the United States.Armelius wrote:Third Israel is a religious state and should not be getting US support at all.
That's a difficult prediction to back up. But I can see how the extremists in the region derive much of their hate for us due to our support of the Jews in that area.Armelius wrote:9/11 wouldn't have happened if the US wasn't an ardent supporter of Israel.
I disagree completely. Last report I head was 400 killed and only 60 of them were innocent civilians. Now that's a terrible thing to have killed 60 innocents... but so far the targeted attacks have been incredibly succesful. Terrorists are very hard to kill because they use innocent civilians as shields.Armelius wrote:It is a cowardly thing Isreal is doing in the Gaza Strip attacking an unseen enemy with aircraft and millions worth of military equipment given to them by the US. If they want to stop Hamas they should go in with their army or ground forces and do a complete search of the area and then leave.
From Wikipedia - "On 31 January 1970, Russell issued a statement which condemned Israeli aggression in the Middle East and called for Israeli withdrawal from territory occupied in 1967."Armelius wrote:I end with a quote from Bertrand Russell:
The tragedy of the people of Palestine is that their country was “given” by a foreign power to another people for the creation of a new state. The result was that many hundreds of thousands of innocent people were made permanently homeless. With every new conflict their numbers increased. How much longer is the world willing to endure this spectacle of wanton cruelty? It is abundantly clear that the refugees have every right to the homeland from which they were driven, and the denial of this right is at the heart of the continuing conflict. No people anywhere in the world would accept being expelled en masse from their own country; how can anyone require the people of Palestine to accept a punishment which nobody else would tolerate? A permanent just settlement of the refugees in their homeland is an essential ingredient of any genuine settlement in the Middle East. We are frequently told that we must sympathise with Israel because of the suffering of the Jews in Europe at the hands of the Nazis. [...] What Israel is doing today cannot be condoned, and to invoke the horrors of the past to justify those of the present is gross hypocrisy.
—Bertrand Russell, 31 January 1970
I agree! The whole region would be much better if none of those countries had nukes!HashiriyaS14 wrote:Israel should be free to fight it's own battles, but I agree that US aid needs to halt or decrease.
Most notably, they only have nukes because we gave them nukes back during the Six Days War. We need to demand the bombs back and also demand total nuclear disarmament. This would remove the incentive/excuse other mideastern nations have to pursue nuclear arms and would make our negotiation position against Iran MUCH stronger.
Wrong. Israel had a Nuclear program of their own. This is why they refused to sign the NNPT.HashiriyaS14 wrote:Israel should be free to fight it's own battles, but I agree that US aid needs to halt or decrease.
Most notably, they only have nukes because we gave them nukes back during the Six Days War. We need to demand the bombs back and also demand total nuclear disarmament. This would remove the incentive/excuse other mideastern nations have to pursue nuclear arms and would make our negotiation position against Iran MUCH stronger.
I didn't peg you for a conspiracy theorist...HashiriyaS14 wrote:Most notably, they only have nukes because we gave them nukes back during the Six Days War. We need to demand the bombs back and also demand total nuclear disarmament. This would remove the incentive/excuse other mideastern nations have to pursue nuclear arms and would make our negotiation position against Iran MUCH stronger.
I am so sorry my friend for I will not give a history lesson in how corporations work or how they are dysfunctional. One can only look at the present for that.Eikon wrote:
That is the most rediculous statement I've ever heard. You mean to tell me that Jews funded Nazi's to kill 6 million Jews just to gain public sentiment to get them relocated back to their homeland? Completely retarded!So are all the Muslim countries in the middle east. So is Utah. So are numerous other countries in the world. Many of which receive foreign aid from the United States. Now I will agree that the 3 Billion that we give to Israel each year in Military Aid could be better spent here in the US on things like education, infrastructure, tax breaks for small business, etc... That's a difficult prediction to back up. But I can see how the extremists in the region derive much of their hate for us due to our support of the Jews in that area. I disagree completely. Last report I head was 400 killed and only 60 of them were innocent civilians. Now that's a terrible thing to have killed 60 innocents... but so far the targeted attacks have been incredibly succesful. Terrorists are very hard to kill because they use innocent civilians as shields.
You think the Palestinian people would rather have the whole Israeli army march in on foot and start turning over tables and opening every closet in the country to find the terrorists?
What they are doing is impressive right now. They have been able to pinpoint weapons caches, terrorlst leaders homes, training facilities, etc.. and have been able to pinpoint the attacks on those small locations.
If only the US had that intelligence to hunt down the Taliban and Bin Ladin instead of having to send all our troops into the desert to search for them.
From Wikipedia - "On 31 January 1970, Russell issued a statement which condemned Israeli aggression in the Middle East and called for Israeli withdrawal from territory occupied in 1967."
From that I gather Russell was referring to the Palestinians made homeless after the 6 day war in 1967 in which Israel took control of the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights.
Today every one of those regions has been given back to the Palestinians just as Russell suggested should happen.
What does Israel get in response to those concessions... Rockets and Missiles lobbed from Gaza into schools and houses in nearby Jewish settlements. Hamas and other terrorlst organizations continue to be terrorists. So Israel fights to reduce the threat from Hamas.
Did you bother to read the post? It appears not. Your jab about LA and NY is exactly the opposite of the entirety of what I was pointing out.Armelius wrote:Just by that history lesson alone with wikipedia and the bible as sources I can predict that Los Angeles and New York City will one day be called Los Israel and New Israel being that jews historically had settled there at one time or another.
My good friend, I have read your post. And I am not so sure if my post was the exact opposite of what you were pointing out.Eikon wrote:
Did you bother to read the post? It appears not. Your jab about LA and NY is exactly the opposite of the entirety of what I was pointing out.
So you think that the Bible cannot be used as a historical document? Nowhere did I bring up anything to do with religious beliefs in the Bible. It is however a solid historical document in which the major events diagramming the history of the Jewish people have been cross-referenced with other historical evidence and found to be true.
Congratulations!!! Your post wins my "drivel of the week" award!Armelius wrote:
My good friend, I have read your post. And I am not so sure if my post was the exact opposite of what you were pointing out.
Bible as a historical document? Please tell me if this was so great a book why isn't it taught in public schools 1-12? The National Enquirer at least had pictures.
If the people of the old testament were so great why were they defeated by their neighbors? Why was a splinter group ultimately became so much more popular and many of the rituals and superstitions dropped by these new followers?
And then there is the people of the third book who at least can point to someone who did live at the time of the writing of their book.
The biggest problem with having one of these old books as your religious law to be enforce by present day soldiers is nothing but slavery of the mind. Only a free thinker is able to attack the superstition and lack of scientific thinking in these books and only a slave master is able to prosecute one who would cast doubts on these "great" books.
In my opinion I am glad Israel has finally used their troops to do less indiscriminate killing. It may not solve all their problems over there but at least this isn't some David vs Goliath (a myth) battle where we at least can see some sort of accountability for each shot fired.
Israel is a religious state founded on a cultural belief. Vatican isn't any different. We shouldn't be supporting religious states. So are we on agreement that they shouldn't be supported? That is my main point.Bwana wrote:
Congratulations!!! Your post wins my "drivel of the week" award!
Seth and Bud have both addressed your points with excellent clarity and thoroughness. It is readily evident that you have no interest in debating the issue, only presenting and re-presenting your personal dogma. There is obviously no communication of ideas going on here...
As i did when i first started dealing with this nut. He really is a waste of time. Seriously, just ignore this guy. It would be really nice to never see that name posting in the politics section again. This thread actually started going in a decent direction, but every time that fool posts its just more mind boggling garbage that derails any thought provoking conversation other than reasons to not smoke pounds of crack.Bwana wrote:Seth and Bud have both addressed your points with excellent clarity and thoroughness.
Exactly.Bwana wrote:It is readily evident that you have no interest in debating the issue, only presenting and re-presenting your personal dogma. There is obviously no communication of ideas going on here...
Living for God was tried in New England. A government was formed in accordance with the Old Testament. The laws, for the most part, were petty and absurd, the penalties cruel and bloody to the last degree. Religious liberty was regarded as a crime, as an insult to God. Persons differing in belief from those in power, were persecuted, whipped, maimed and exiled. People supposed to be in league with the devil were imprisoned or killed. A theological government was established, ministers were the agents of God, they dictated the laws and fixed the penalties. Everything was under the supervision of the clergy. They had no pity, no mercy. With all their hearts they hated the natural. They promised happiness in another world, and did all they could to destroy the pleasures of this.480sx wrote:
As i did when i first started dealing with this nut. He really is a waste of time. Seriously, just ignore this guy. It would be really nice to never see that name posting in the politics section again. This thread actually started going in a decent direction, but every time that fool posts its just more mind boggling garbage that derails any thought provoking conversation other than reasons to not smoke pounds of crack.
Exactly.
AR- Maybe you should try to get points across by only quoting famous people. NOT infamous crazy loons(your not infamous), just famous people. The Bertrand Russell quote was nice. For the nico politics forum, you should have a special keyboard that only has a Ctrl key, a C key, and a V key. Hell ill even let you have a space bar key because i dont think you can get yourself into any trouble with it.